Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 20163 ALL
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 80 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3159 of 2016 Revisionist :- Raj Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sudhir Bharti Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Om Prakash Tripathi,J.
List revised. None present on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment and order 29.7.2016 passed Additional District & Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court, Family Court No.2,Ghaziabad in Case No.306 of 2013 by which the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been allowed.
Perused the impugned order by which, there appears no illegality or material irregularity or manifest error in the impugned order. Matter is 6 years old. It appears that due to efflux of time, revisionist has lost interest in the matter and does not want to pursue the matter further.
In view of the above, this criminal revision is accordingly, dismissed.
Inform court concerned.
Order Date :- 6.12.2022
Monika
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!