Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9291 ALL
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 83 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3899 of 2014 Revisionist :- Phool Badan Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Janardan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate,J.P.N.Singh Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned judgment.
This appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 30.09.2014 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rasara District Ballia in case no. 3 of 2010 (Dineshwar Singh Vs. Phoolbadan) under Section 133, Cr.P.C., P.S. Nagara Tehsil Rasara District Ballia.
From perusal of record, this Court finds no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order. View taken by Sub Divisional Magistrate is plausible view, hence no interference is called for in revision.
In view of the above, the revision is dismissed on merit and the order impugned is affirmed.
Order Date :- 4.8.2022
Ashish
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!