Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Julee vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
2022 Latest Caselaw 11032 ALL

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11032 ALL
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2022

Allahabad High Court
Julee vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 23 August, 2022
Bench: Gautam Chowdhary



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 85
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21186 of 2022
 

 
Applicant :- Julee
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Lalji Yadav,Yashpal Yadav
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State

This application has been filed with a prayer to to quash the order dated 27.1.2021 taking cognizance under sections 323, 452, 504, 506 IPC in pursuance of charge sheet dated 29.8.2020 arising out of case crime No. 139 of 2020 and under sections 323, 354-B, 452, 504, 506 IPC and section 7/8 POCSO Act, P.S. Khajani, District Gorakhpur of criminal case N. 4957 of 2021 State Vs. Anurag), pending before J.M. court no. 3, Gorakhpur.

Counsel for the applicants confines his arguments to the first part of the submission that the summoning order is bereft of application of mind and has been passed on the cyclostyled copy. He thus argues that the summoning order suffers from the vice of non-application of mind and therefore is liable to be set aside on that ground alone. In support of his submission, he placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Megh Nath Gupta & another Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2008 (62) ACC 826 as well as Single Judge judgment and order passed by this Court in the case of Ankit Vs. State of U.P. and another [(2009) (9) ADJ 778] on an Application No. 19647 of 2009 filed under Section 482 CrPC on 15.10.2009. He, thus, argues that the summoning order is liable to be set aside in view of the well settled law of this Court. He also placed before me several orders passed by this Court whereby similar orders have been set aside by this Court and the matters have been remanded before the Trial Court for fresh orders in accordance with law.

A perusal of the summoning order impugned in the present proceedings clearly demonstrates that there was no application of mind whatsoever prior to the passing of the summoning order, which has been repelled by this Court in various judgments.

In view of the categorical pronouncements of this Court, the impugned order dated 27.1.2021 is set aside and the matter is remanded before the concerned court below for passing fresh orders of summoning and cognizance if it deems fit.

Consequently, the application is allowed in part in terms of the order passed above.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Court below for its compliance as stated above.

Order Date :- 23.8.2022

RPD

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter