Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 952 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 93 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2277 of 2004 Revisionist :- Ram Lakhan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- K.K. Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the revisionist. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 24.03.2004 passed by learned Special Judge, Dacoity Affected Area, Kanpur Dehat in Misc. Application No. 18/12 of 2004, rejecting the application moved on behalf of revisionist under Section 145(3) Cr.P.C. for registering and investigating the case against the opposite party Nos. 2 to 11.
Learned A.G.A. submits that the present revision is of the year, 2004 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below and also perused the record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below.
In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same needs no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the order under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned A.G.A. that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
Let the lower court record, if any, be returned back to the court concerned.
The file is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 8.4.2022
Mustaqeem.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!