Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8452 ALL
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 95 of 2006 Revisionist :- Raj Kishore Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Bishram Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Re: Crl. Misc. Application No. 31425 of 2006 (Under Section 5 of Limitation Act).
None has appeared on behalf of the applicant. Learned A.G.A. is present for State/Opposite Party.
Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
There is delay of 73 days in filing the present revision and none has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application moreover having gone through the impugned order I do not find any
Accordingly, the delay condonation application is rejected.
Order on Memo of Revision.
Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision. Otherwise also the delay condonation application is rejected, consequently the revision is also dismissed.
Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 22.7.2021
S.Verma
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!