Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod And 2 Others vs State Of U.P.
2021 Latest Caselaw 917 ALL

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 917 ALL
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2021

Allahabad High Court
Vinod And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. on 13 January, 2021
Bench: Siddharth



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 73
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 561 of 2021
 

 
Applicant :- Vinod And 2 Others
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Dubey
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application

This exemption application is allowed.

Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Mohammad Belal,counsel forthe informant and learned A.G.A for the State.

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants,Vinod, Saurabh and Subhash, with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 54 of 2019, under Sections- 323, 504 and 324 IPC, Police Station- Bahadurgarh, District- Hapur, during pendency of trial.

Having heardlearnedcounsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of the Apex Court in the case ofP. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

However, in view of the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed, on the request of counsel for the applicants, that in case the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 90 days from today and applies for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as per the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Till then no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.

It is made clear that the applicants will not be granted any further time by this court for surrendering before the court below as directed above.

With the aforesaid directions, this application is finallydisposed of.

Order Date :- 13.1.2021

Rohit

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter