Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1131 ALL
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 63946 of 2015 Petitioner :- Jiut Bandhan Pandey Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohit Singh,Satyam Singh,Shiv Nath Singh Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
Controversy raised in the present petition has already been answered by Division Bench of this Court vide judgment, dated 7.11.2017, passed in Writ Petition No. 30300 of 2015.
In the facts of the present case, four out of five pages of the enquiry report merely contains the explanation of the petitioner with a finding of enquiry officer contained in the last paragraph which merely states that petitioner's justification is not liable to be accepted.
Enquiry report is absolutely cryptic and legally unsustainable. For the reasons recorded by the Division Bench in its judgment, dated 7.11.2017, this writ petition also succeeds and is allowed. The order dated, 3.10.2015, passed by respondent no. 2, stands quashed.
Order Date :- 19.1.2021
Ranjeet Sahu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!