Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 6122 ALL
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1406 of 2017 Petitioner :- Ashfaque Hussain And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rafiuddin Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amresh Singh,Ramendra Asthana Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Sri Ramendra Asthana advocate is already representing respondent nos. 5, 6 and 7. The report of the District Judge, Budaun dated 1.3.2017 reveals that service on respondent nos. 5 to 10 is sufficient, whereas notice was sought to be served on respondents 11 and 12 by affixation.
The petitioners are permitted to serve respondent nos. 11 and 12 by registered post by taking steps within a week.
List the matter again alongwith the office report regarding service on respondent nos.11 and 12.
Interim order shall continue till the next date of listing.
If steps are not taken within the time prescribed, office shall list the matter under Ch.XXII Rule 4 of the Rules of Court, immediately after one week.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 1.11.2017
skv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!