Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4979 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 10 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 15347 of 2016 Petitioner :- Smt. Neelam Gupta Respondent :- District Judge Lucknow And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- U.N. Misra,Gaurav Mehrotra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J.
None appears for the petitioner.
Sri Gaurav Mehrotra states that as per decision of the District Judge, the petitioner's representation has been allowed and she has been granted the benefit of gratuity and pension.
In view of aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. If the petitioner is further aggrieved, she may approach the District Judge by means of filing a fresh representation.
The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Order Date :- 8.8.2016
Vijay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!