Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1315 ALL
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 55717 of 2000 Petitioner :- Smt. Anita Rani Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- V.S.Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Hon'ble Shamsher Bahadur Singh,J.
1. Called in revised. None appeared on behalf of petitioners. However, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
?(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party no. 1 and 2 to establish the District Unit as provided in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986."
3. Having gone through the entire writ petition, I do not find any ground entitling the petitioners for grant of any of above reliefs. No interference, therefore, is called for.
4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.4.2016
Pravin
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!