Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 536 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 23 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 1581 of 2003 Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secy Milk Dugdha Vikas And 3 Ors Petitioner Counsel :- Ram Lakhan Vishwakarma,A P Singh Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Sudeep Kumar Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner in the morning had requested for the adjourned of the case.
On the petition being called out, learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the adjournment.
In view of the fact that request in the morning was accepted and the counsel for the petitioner is in difficulty as he wants to bring on record certain facts which have intervened the petition is adjourned for today with the direction to list it in the week commencing 22.4.2013.
In the meantime, learned counsel for the petitioner may file whatever documents he wants for which no further time shall be allowed.
When the petition is listed next, record of Contempt Petition No.1180 of 2003 shall also be sent by the office.
Order Date :- 8.4.2013
R.U.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!