Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 1278 ALL
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 23 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 9105 of 1993 Petitioner :- Pancham Singh Respondent :- Provincial Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd Thru Its M.D.&Or Petitioner Counsel :- Sanjai Kumar,B.K.Singh Respondent Counsel :- R.K. Nigam Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
A perusal of the order sheet reveals that the notices were directed to be issued to all the respondents.
Sri Rakesh Kumar Nigam has already put in appearance on behalf of respondents no. 1 to 4. Respondent no. 5 was not served. Therefore, fresh notices were directed to be issued to respondent no. 5.
Today, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to delete the name of respondent no. 5.
Accordingly, he is directed to delete the name of respondent no. 5.
With the deletion of name of respondent no. 5, no further steps are required to be taken to serve respondent no. 5.
Office to proceed and to list the case for consideration before the appropriate Bench.
Order Date :- 24.4.2013
SKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!