Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 1138 ALL
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 25 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1329 of 2009 Petitioner :- Shabbir Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another Petitioner Counsel :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Mrs. Jayashree Tiwari,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is present and submits that counter affidavit has not been filed.
A perusal of the record shows that opportunity of hearing and notice with regard to the same has already been served on the opposite party. Very initial order dated 9.4.2009 clearly shows that only 50% maintenance amount is directed that it shall remain stayed. Regarding remaining 50% of the amount, no document has been filed or shown to prove that it is being regularly paid.
Due to non compliance of the order of the court and also by efflux of time, it appears that the revision has become infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed.
The revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.4.2013
Monika
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!