Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gavendra Singh Alias Daini vs State Of U.P.
2011 Latest Caselaw 1682 ALL

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 1682 ALL
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2011

Allahabad High Court
Gavendra Singh Alias Daini vs State Of U.P. on 13 May, 2011
Bench: Arvind Kumar Tripathi



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 47
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12522 of 2011
 

 
Petitioner :- Gavendra Singh Alias Daini
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
 
Petitioner Counsel :- S.K. Tiwari,M.M. Yaduvanshi
 
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate
 

 
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is  innocent and  has  been falsely implicated in this case.  There was no   motive to commit murder, hence,  he was released on bail. The applicant was appearing before the court regularly for five years. Subsequently, the father of the applicant expired, hence the applicant could not appear on the date fixed before the court. Thereafter, the applicant went to Delhi along with his sister to send her. At Delhi the applicant was implicated under section 25 of Arms Act and he was released from jail on  28.1.2011. Thereafter, he received serious injury and was under treatment. The Medical prescription has been filed as annexure-2 to this application.  However, the applicant has himself surrendered before the court concerned on 22.3.2011 and since then he is in jail.

Learned AGA opposed the aforesaid prayer on the ground that for a long period, the applicant was absent, hence he is not entitled for bail. 

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, totality of facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I consider it a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant   Gavendra Singh alias Daini   be released on bail on his  furnishing a personal bond and two  heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in case crime no. 24 of 2004 under section 302 IPC, P.S. Jaithra, District Etah provided the applicant cooperates with the trial. In case of non-cooperation by the applicant, the trial court shall be free to take  him in custody and send in jail.

Order Date :- 13.5.2011

Gss

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter