Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Janki Devi Jain vs Shiv Shanker Jaisawal (Deceased) ...
2011 Latest Caselaw 1618 ALL

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 1618 ALL
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2011

Allahabad High Court
Smt. Janki Devi Jain vs Shiv Shanker Jaisawal (Deceased) ... on 11 May, 2011
Bench: Rajes Kumar



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 4
 

 
Case :- CIVIL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 34 of 2011
 

 
Petitioner :- Smt. Janki Devi Jain
 
Respondent :- Shiv Shanker Jaisawal (Deceased) And Others
 
Petitioner Counsel :- Narendra Mohan
 
Respondent Counsel :- Smt. Rama Goel Bansal
 

 
Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.

One Shiv Shanker Jaiswal filed a SCC Suit No. 17 of 1999 after issuing a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act for ejectment of the revisionist and arrear of rent. In the plaint it was averred that he was the exclusive owner of the property in dispute. During the pendency of the suit, Shiv Shanker Jaiswal died. His heirs have been substituted in his place. It appears that a compromise has been arrived between the heirs of Shiv Shanker Jaiswal and the revisionist. It also appears that a family settlement took place in which the property in dispute has been given to Krishna Murari Jaiswal and he became exclusive owner of the property in dispute. After the family settlement, the name of Krishna Murari Jaiswal along with his wife and sons have been substituted as plaintiffs and the name of the heirs of Shiv Shanker Jaiswal have been deleted. The suit proceeded accordingly. Vide order dated 25.2.2011 the suit has been decreed.

The contention of the revisionist is that as per the settlement the rent was Rs.100/- per month which has been duly paid and there was no outstanding dues. The suit has been decreed on the ground that the rent was Rs.800/- per month, which has not been deposited. The contention of the petitioner is that once under the agreement the rent was settled at Rs.100/- per month and the agreement was binding upon Krishna Murari Jaiswal and, therefore, the impugned order is bad in law.

The matter requires consideration.

Smt. Rama Goel Bansal, Advocate prays for and is granted three weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

List in the week commencing 11.7.2011.

Till the next date of listing, the operation of the order dated 25.2.2011 passed by the Additional District Judge / Special Judge, E.C. Act, Allahabad in SCC Suit no. 17 of 1999 shall remain stayed. Meanwhile, the revisionist is directed to pay all the outstanding dues towards rent and damages @ Rs.100/- per month.

Order Date :- 11.5.2011

OP

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter