Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 2296 ALL
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2011
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10828 of 2011 Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Chaudhary & Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Petitioner Counsel :- Praveen Kumar Srivastava Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
Hon'ble Yogesh Chandra Gupta,J.
Notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has been accepted by learned AGA.
Issue notice to the respondent No.3, fixing 26th July, 2011.
It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that the complainant, respondent No.3, is a defaulter to the tune of Rs.2,17,369/- and further that she was involved in theft of electricity. An F.I.R. was lodged by the Officials of the U.P. Power Corporation being Case Crime No.589 of 2011, under Sections 147, 186, 332, 353 I.P.C. and Section 135 of the Electricity Act against the son of respondent No.3 and 15 unknown persons on 5.4.2011. As a counterblast, the respondent No.3, who is a Corporator, lodged the impugned F.I.R. against the petitioners, who are Officers of the Power Corporation, under Section 3(10) of S.C./S.T. Act. In view of the facts of the case, it is contended that the F.I.R. is wholly malafide and even otherwise abuse of the process and the matter needs inquiry by this Court.
Till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners, namely, Ashok Kumar Chaudhary and Krishna Mohan Singh in terms of the FIR, however, the investigation may go on.
Order Date :- 10.6.2011
NS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!