Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Air Force Act, 1950

Bare Act Title Category / State
Air Force Act, 1950 Armed Forces Laws
 

List of Judgements

Union of India & Ors. Vs. Wing Commander M.S. Mander

Judgement Date : november/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 687 SC

Lenin Kumar Ray Vs. Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd.

Judgement Date : october/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 658 SC

S.P. Pandey Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Judgement Date : october/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 657 SC

Bharti Airtel Limited Vs A.s. Raghavendra

Judgement Date : april/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 207 SC

Union of India & Ors. Vs. Air Commodore NK Sharma (17038) ADM/LGL

Judgement Date : december/2023, Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 925 SC

Union of India & Ors. Vs. Parashotam Dass

Judgement Date : march/2023, Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 240 SC

Office of the Odisha Lokayukta Vs. Dr. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi and Ors.

Judgement Date : february/2023, Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 135 SC

K.V. Anil Mithra Vs. Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit

Judgement Date : october/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 527 SC

BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED vs. PRADEEP MEHRA

Judgement Date : april/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 353 SC

Headnote :

The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Section 4(3) addresses gratuity entitlement. The respondent was appointed as the Chief Operating Officer of the appellant company under specified terms, which included eligibility for gratuity as per legal provisions. After resigning, the respondent claimed gratuit...

UNION OF INDIA vs. R. KARTHIK

Judgement Date : january/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 59 SC

Headnote :

A. According to Section 45(a) of the Navy Act, 1957, the order of dismissal has been replaced with a punishment of 75 days of detention, while the deprivation of the First Good Conduct Badge remains in effect. The appellant, who was appointed as a Sailor in the Naval Service, faced allegations of as...

UNION OF INDIA vs. CHANDRA BHUSHAN YADAV

Judgement Date : january/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 46 SC

Headnote :

A. According to the Air Force Rules of 1969, specifically Rule 24, Rule 43(4), and Rule 156(2), (6), and (7), as well as the Air Force Act of 1950, Regulations Para 804 (b), Section 52(c), and 111, the issues of theft and misappropriation of kerosene and diesel have led to the dismissal from service...

UNION OF INDIA vs. EX NO. 3192684 W SEP. VIRENDRA KUMAR

Judgement Date : january/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 6 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTArmy Act - The absence of an opportunity to be present throughout the inquiry during Court of Inquiry proceedings cannot be raised once a final order has been issued by the Court Martial following a comprehensive trial.Army Act - The lack of opportunity to be present throughout the inquiry...

UNION OF INDIA vs. P.S.GILL

Judgement Date : november/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1156 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe order convening a General Court Martial can be contested in an appeal before the Armed Forces Tribunal.According to the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, specifically Sections 3(o), 14, and 15, the AFT has jurisdiction over matters related to General Court Martial. Conditions of service...

UNION OF INDIA vs. RASHID H.

Judgement Date : october/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1031 SC

Headnote :

Air Force Act, 1950 Section 20(3) Air Force Rules, 1969, Rule 156 - Dismissal from service - Validity - When a delinquent acknowledges their guilt, there is no further obligation for the authorities to demonstrate that the delinquent committed the offense. The delinquent made a statement during a co...

Ex. LAC Yogesh Pathania Vs. Union of India

Judgement Date : january/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 23 SC

Sqn. Ldr. (Retd.) Navtej Singh Vs. Union of India

Judgement Date : december/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 908 SC

Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha Vs. Union of India & Ors. [MAY 18, 2018]

Judgement Date : may/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 403 SC

Shakti Vahini Vs. Union of India and others [March 27, 2018]

Judgement Date : march/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 212 SC

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Ex LAC Nallam Shiva [August 10, 2017]

Judgement Date : august/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 564 SC

Union of India and Ors. Vs. K.P. Singh and ANR. [12th January, 2017]

Judgement Date : january/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 46 SC

Union of India & Ors. Vs. Devjee Mishra [September 27, 2016]

Judgement Date : september/2016, Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 700 SC

Raj Kumar Vs. Director of Education & Ors. [April 13, 2016]

Judgement Date : april/2016, Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 288 SC

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.I. & others [May 20, 2013]

Judgement Date : may/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 397 SC

Devinder Singh Vs Municipal Council, Sanaur

Judgement Date : april/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 359 SC

Ram Narayan Tiwari Vs Union of India & Ors.

Judgement Date : february/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 137 SC

Union of India Vs. S.P.S. Rajkumar and Ors [2007] Insc 446 (24 April 2007)

Judgement Date : april/2007, Citation : 2007 Latest Caselaw 374 SC

Sharad Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors [2002] INSC 192 (11 April 2002)

Judgement Date : april/2002, Citation : 2002 Latest Caselaw 192 SC

Balbir Singh Vs. State of Punjab [1994] INSC 575 (10 November 1994)

Judgement Date : november/1994, Citation : 1994 Latest Caselaw 569 SC

Miss A. Sundarambal Vs. Government of Goa, Daman and Diu & Ors [1988] INSC 189 (27 July 1988)

Judgement Date : july/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 188 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a school teacher, had her employment terminated by the Management. Despite her numerous attempts to have the termination order revoked, she was unsuccessful. Eventually, she initiated an industrial dispute with the Conciliation officer under the Act. However, the conciliation proceedi...

Ajmer Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors [1987] INSC 143 (29 April 1987)

Judgement Date : april/1987, Citation : 1987 Latest Caselaw 142 SC

Headnote :

Section 167 of the Army Act, 1950 states that when a person is sentenced to imprisonment by a Court-Martial, the sentence will begin on the day the original proceedings are signed by the Presiding Officer. Meanwhile, Section 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure clarifies that the Code does not alter...

Arkal Govind Raj Rao Vs. Ciba Geigy of India Ltd., Bombay [1985] INSC122 (6 May 1985)

Judgement Date : may/1985, Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 122 SC

Headnote :

The appellant began his career as a Stenographer-cum-Accountant with the respondent company. He was later promoted to the position of Assistant, where he remained until his employment was terminated in October 1972. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Administration) referred the matter to the Labour...

Chief of The Army Staff & Ors Vs. Major Dharam Pal Kukrety [1985] INSC 64 (21 March 1985)

Judgement Date : march/1985, Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 64 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, a permanent commissioned officer in the Indian Army with the substantive rank of captain and the acting rank of major, was ordered to face a general court martial due to certain incidents alleged to have occurred on November 5 and 6, 1975. On March 13, 1976, the court martial deliver...

A.Younus Kunju Vs. R.S. Unni & Ors [1984] INSC 56 (8 March 1984)

Judgement Date : march/1984, Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 56 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who was employed by the respondent, faced charges for mistreating a fellow employee or a management officer within the respondent\'s factory premises. Following a domestic inquiry, the Inquiry Officer determined that the appellant was guilty of the allegations, leading to the manageme...

Ved Prakash Gupta Vs. Delton Cable India (P) Ltd. [1984] INSC 55 (8 March 1984)

Judgement Date : march/1984, Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 55 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who was employed by the respondent, faced charges for mistreating a fellow employee or a management officer within the respondent\'s factory premises. Following a domestic inquiry, the Inquiry Officer determined that the appellant was guilty of the allegations, leading to the manageme...

S. K. Verma Vs. Mahesh Chandra & ANR [1983] INSC 111 (2 September 1983)

Judgement Date : september/1983, Citation : 1983 Latest Caselaw 111 SC

Headnote :

In reference to the dismissal of the appellant, who served as a Development Officer at the Life Insurance Corporation, the Industrial Tribunal accepted a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the reference. It determined that Development Officers within the Corporation did not quali...

L. Robert D'souza Vs. The Executive Engineer Southern Railway & ANR [1982] INSC 20 (16 February 1982)

Judgement Date : february/1982, Citation : 1982 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

Headnote :

The appellant began his career as a gangman with Southern Railway on July 1, 1948, and was subsequently transferred to various locations during his service. While working as a Lascar in Ernakulam, he was transferred in March 1970 as a punitive measure due to his involvement in Union activities as th...

F.R. Jesuratnam Vs. Union of India & Ors [1981] INSC 119 (22 July 1981)

Judgement Date : july/1981, Citation : 1981 Latest Caselaw 119 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a commissioned officer in the Indian Air Force, was dismissed and sentenced to six years of rigorous imprisonment by a General Court Martial.Later, the Central Government commuted the remaining term of his rigorous imprisonment. Subsequently, he was hired by the Indian Institute of Te...

National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. Pritam Singh Gill & Ors [1972] INSC 97 (29 March 1972)

Judgement Date : march/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 97 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, who was an employee of the appellant, faced suspension, which remained effective until he was dismissed. He filed a petition with the Labour Court under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking a calculation of the benefits and payments owed to him during his susp...

Management of The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce Vs. Their Workman, Shri R. K. Mittal [1971] INSC 309 (15 November 1971)

Judgement Date : november/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 309 SC

Headnote :

The individual in question was an employee of the appellant Federation.His services were temporarily assigned to the Indian National Committee of the International Chamber of Commerce during the 20th Congress of the International Chamber of Commerce, which took place in Delhi in February 1965. He re...

Burmah Shell Oil Storage & Distribution Coof India Vs. Burmah Shell Management Staff Association & Ors [1970] INSC 235 (12 November 1970)

Judgement Date : november/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 235 SC

Headnote :

The junior management staff members of the Burmah Shell Management Staff Association initiated an industrial dispute, which the Government subsequently referred to the Industrial Tribunal. This referral was limited to the junior management staff in the Maharashtra region. At the time of the referral...

Management of Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi Vs. Kuldip Singh Sethi [1970] INSC 81 (1 April 1970)

Judgement Date : april/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 81 SC

Headnote :

(1) The definition of \"industry\" in section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 consists of two parts, but it should be interpreted as a complete statement. It indicates a collective endeavor involving both employers and employees. An industry does not exist solely with employers or employee...

Secretary, Madras Gymkhana Club Employees'union Vs. Management of The Gymkhana Club [1967] INSC 229 (3 October 1967)

Judgement Date : october/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 229 SC

Headnote :

The respondent operates as a non-proprietary members\' club, organized on a large scale with a variety of activities that offer facilities for sports, games, recreation, entertainment, and food and beverage services. Guests can only enter the club if invited by members. The club employs 194 staff me...

All India Reserve Bank Employees Association Vs. Reserve Bank of India [1965] INSC 121 (23 April 1965)

Judgement Date : april/1965, Citation : 1965 Latest Caselaw 121 SC

Headnote :

The Class II and Class III staff of the Reserve Bank of India, represented by their Association, along with the Class IV staff through their Union, initiated an industrial dispute with the Bank. This dispute was referred by the Central Government on March 21, 1960, to the National Tribunal. The issu...