Monday, 20, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Punjab Pre-Emption Act, 1913

Bare Act Title Category / State
Punjab Pre-Emption Act, 1913 Himachal Pradesh State Laws
 

List of Judgements

State of Haryana through Secretary to Government of Haryana Vs. Jai Singh

Judgement Date : april/2022, Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 297 SC

Vijay Singh Vs. Shanti Devi and ANR. [September 08, 2017]

Judgement Date : september/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 654 SC

Pirthi Vs. Mohan Singh & Ors

Judgement Date : september/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 657 SC

G.Sekar Vs. Geetha & Ors. [2009] INSC 741 (15 April 2009)

Judgement Date : april/2009, Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 366 SC

Jai Singh & Ors. Vs. Gurmej Singh [2009] INSC 102 (20 January 2009)

Judgement Date : january/2009, Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 96 SC

Lachhman Dass Vs. Jagat Ram & Ors [2007] Insc 164 (20 February 2007)

Judgement Date : february/2007, Citation : 2007 Latest Caselaw 164 SC

Jinda Ram Vs. Ram Prakash & ANR [1995] INSC 658 (10 November 1995)

Judgement Date : november/1995, Citation : 1995 Latest Caselaw 646 SC

Karnail Singh Vs. Anil Kumar & ANR [1995] INSC 33 (10 January 1995)

Judgement Date : january/1995, Citation : 1995 Latest Caselaw 33 SC

Ram Chand Vs. Randhir Singh [1994] INSC 514 (5 October 1994)

Judgement Date : october/1994, Citation : 1994 Latest Caselaw 508 SC

Krishna Vs. State of Haryana [1994] INSC 357 (12 July 1994)

Judgement Date : july/1994, Citation : 1994 Latest Caselaw 352 SC

Bhikha Ram Vs. Ram Sarup & Ors [1991] INSC 282 (31 October 1991)

Judgement Date : october/1991, Citation : 1991 Latest Caselaw 282 SC

Darshan Singh & ANR Vs. Ram Pal Singh & ANR [1990] INSC 363 (20 November 1990)

Judgement Date : november/1990, Citation : 1990 Latest Caselaw 363 SC

Headnote :

Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1920: Section 7 Alienations of immovable property--Contesting of--Effect of Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Amendment Act, 1973 Wheth- er retrospective and applicable to pending proceedings. Punjab Laws Act 1872, Section 5. Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 Effect o...

Kanta Rani C Kanti Devi & ANR Vs. Rama Rani [1988] INSC 35 (8 February 1988)

Judgement Date : february/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 35 SC

Headnote :

The property in dispute was sold by its original owner to the respondent. Claiming that there was a local custom under which the tenant in occupation of a building had a right of pre-emption, the tenant of a portion of the property filed a suit for pre-emption and valued the portion at Rs.10,000. Th...

Prabhakaran Nair, Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors [1987] INSC 240 (3 September 1987)

Judgement Date : september/1987, Citation : 1987 Latest Caselaw 239 SC

Headnote :

There was 'much ado about nothing' about these Writ Petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution. The petitions sought to challenge the Vires of sections 14(1)(b), 16(2) and, incidentally, sec. 30(ii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 on the ground of being arb...

Jagdish & Ors Vs. Nathi Mal Kejriwal & Ors [1986] INSC 217 (24 October 1986)

Judgement Date : october/1986, Citation : 1986 Latest Caselaw 217 SC

Headnote :

Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 were joint owners of the suit land. They sold it to respondent nos. 1 to 4 on 25.10.71. The petitioners, sous and nephews of the vendors, instituted a suit before the sub-Judge, Palwal for possession of the suit land on payment of the sale consideration on the ground that t...

Atam Prakash Vs. State of Haryana & Ors [1986] INSC 24 (27 February 1986)

Judgement Date : february/1986, Citation : 1986 Latest Caselaw 24 SC

Headnote :

Interpretation of statutes - Provision of Constitution sought to be interpreted or a statute whose constitutional validity is sought to be questioned - Interpretation that will promote march & Progress towards a Socialistic Democratic State - To be given. Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption...

Zila Singh & Ors Vs. Hazari & Ors [1979] INSC 52 (25 February 1979)

Judgement Date : february/1979, Citation : 1979 Latest Caselaw 52 SC

Headnote :

The original vendor of the lands in dispute sold them to the first vendee. In the meantime three decrees for pre- emption were passed in favour of the pre-emptor and against the vendor and his vendees. After satisfying the conditions imposed in the decrees regarding deposit of certain sums of money...

Munshi & Ors Vs. Richpal & Ors [1977] INSC 60 (17 February 1977)

Judgement Date : february/1977, Citation : 1977 Latest Caselaw 60 SC

Headnote :

Section 7 of the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955, which deals with termination of tenancy, provides that no tenancy shall be 'terminated except on any of the grounds mentioned in the section. Section 7 gives additional grounds for termination of tenancy in certain cases. Respon...

Bhagwan Das (Dead) By Lrs. & Ors Vs. Chet Ram [1970] INSC 221 (16 October 1970)

Judgement Date : october/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 221 SC

Headnote :

The appellants purchased certain lands and filed a suit against the respondent, who was the tenant-at-will under the vendor, for ejectment The suit was decreed. The appellants entered into possession and the tenancy of the respondent was determined. Thereafter, the respondent filed a suit for posses...

State of Punjab Vs. Ramjilal & Ors [1970] INSC 212 (12 October 1970)

Judgement Date : october/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 212 SC

Headnote :

Surinder Kumar and Virender Kumar (defendants in the suit) purchased on May 9, 1958 a plot of land in District Gurgaon. On January 9, 1959 the plaintiffs filed a suit in the Civil Court to pre-empt the sale. On November 16, 1961 the Government of Punjab issued in exercise of the power conferred b...

Mula & Ors Vs. Godhu & Ors [1969] INSC 205 (28 August 1969)

Judgement Date : august/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 205 SC

Headnote :

After the land in suit was sold in June, 1957, for an ostensible sum of Rs. 1,35:000/-, the appellants and respondents 1 to 3 instituted two separate suits for preemptions in which the sale price inserted in the sale deed was also questioned. The two suits were consolidated and the plaintiffs in eac...

Chanan Singh & ANR Vs. Jai Kaur [1969] INSC 173 (11 August 1969)

Judgement Date : august/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 173 SC

Headnote :

S, the owner of some land in a village in Punjab, died leaving a widow and the respondent, his daughter by another wife. The widow sold a part of the land in February 1958 to the appellants, whereupon the respondent filed a suit for possession by pre-emption of the land sold. The trial court decreed...

Hazari & Ors Vs. Neki & Ors [1968] INSC 14 (25 January 1968)

Judgement Date : january/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 14 SC

Headnote :

By s. 4 of the Amending Act (Punj. Act 10 of 1960) s. 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 was repealed and in its place was substituted a new provision which omitted to confer a right of pre-emption in the case of persons 'owning land in the estate' as the original s. 15(c) 'thirdly&#...

Prem Dulari Vs. Raj Kumari [1967] INSC 73 (23 March 1967)

Judgement Date : march/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 73 SC

Headnote :

The second respondent sold her house to the appellant. The first respondent filed a suit for possession of the house on the ground that she had a right of prior purchase under s. 15 (fourthly) of the Right of Prior Purchase Act 1993, because, her house and the house in question had a common outer...

Shibsankar Nandy Vs. Prabartak Sangha & Ors [1967] INSC 24 (1 February 1967)

Judgement Date : february/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 24 SC

Headnote :

Respondent No. 1, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, took to lease a piece of land part of which was already leased to Respondents 2 and 3. Under the lease Respondent No.1 was entitled to receive rent from Respondents 2 and 3. The latter transferred the land held by the...

Ram Sarup Vs. Munshi & Ors [1962] INSC 246 (30 August 1962)

Judgement Date : august/1962, Citation : 1962 Latest Caselaw 246 SC

Headnote :

The owner of certain agricultural land in Punjab sold it to the second respondent by a deed dated December 12, 1957 The son of the vendor claimed that he had a right of Pre. emption and instituted a suit against the appellant who purchased the land from the first respondent, and relied upon the p...

Bhau Ram Vs. B. Baijnath Singh [1962] INSC 87 (7 March 1962)

Judgement Date : march/1962, Citation : 1962 Latest Caselaw 87 SC

Headnote :

Section 10 of the Rewa State Pre-emption Act, 1946, conferred the right of pre-emption on the ground, inter alia of vicinage. The proviso to S. 10 provided that among preemptors of the same class the nearer in relationship to the vendor will exclude the more remote. There were provisions in the Act...