Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on IPC Section 467. Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.

Bare Act Title Category / State
IPC Section 467. Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. Criminal Laws
 

List of Judgements

Naveen Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Judgement Date : march/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 144 SC

Headnote :

A. Under the Indian Penal Code of 1860, Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B, as well as Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act of 1986, the issue of bail arises in a case involving forgery in court records through the use of whitener. The mere filing of...

PADUM KUMAR vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judgement Date : january/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTConviction cannot rely solely on the testimony of a handwriting expert, as it serves only as corroborative evidence.A. Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 467 and 468 concerning forgery of valuable securities and cheating - A handwriting expert\'s report indicated that the accused,...

Raj Narain Vs. Union of India

Judgement Date : april/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 326 SC

Sheila Sebastian Vs. R. Jawaharaj & ANR. Etc. [May 11, 2018]

Judgement Date : may/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 370 SC

Issac @ Kishor Vs. Ronald Cheriyan And Ors. [January 23, 2018]

Judgement Date : january/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 32 SC

Punjab State Warehousing Corp. Vs. Bhushan Chander & ANR. [June 29, 2016]

Judgement Date : june/2016, Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 426 SC

Jasbir Singh Vs. Tara Singh and others [September 21, 2015]

Judgement Date : september/2015, Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 622 SC

Dayanand Ramkrishna Shet versus State of Karnataka [May 9, 2014]

Judgement Date : may/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 360 SC

Suresh Hingorani Vs. State of Haryana [January 10, 2013]

Judgement Date : january/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 39 SC

Parminder Kaur Vs. State of U.P. & ANR. [2009] INSC 1676 (26 October 2009)

Judgement Date : october/2009, Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 865 SC

Mustafikhan Vs. State of Maharashtra [2006] Insc 893 (4 December 2006)

Judgement Date : december/2006, Citation : 2006 Latest Caselaw 836 SC

Ram Pratap Yadav Vs. Mitra Sen Yadav & ANR [2002] INSC483 (20 November 2002)

Judgement Date : november/2002, Citation : 2002 Latest Caselaw 484 SC

State of U.P. Vs. Ranjit Singh [1999] of 47 (19 February 1999)

Judgement Date : february/1999, Citation : 1999 Latest Caselaw 47 SC

State of Rajasthan Vs. Aruna Devi & Ors [1994] INSC 566 (8 November 1994)

Judgement Date : november/1994, Citation : 1994 Latest Caselaw 560 SC

Balwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab [1993] INSC 256 (3 May 1993)

Judgement Date : may/1993, Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 252 SC

Headnote :

Permission granted.

Narendra Pratap Narain Singh & ANR Vs. State of U.P [1991] INSC 87 (3 April 1991)

Judgement Date : april/1991, Citation : 1991 Latest Caselaw 87 SC

Headnote :

In the years 1964-65, the first appellant was responsible for a seed store associated with a block Development Office, which served the needs of local farmers. He faced charges of breach of trust under Section 409 of the IPC, accused of creating forged bills amounting to Rs.1591.04 in the names of c...

Kapoor Chand Maganlal Chanderia Vs. Delhi State (Administration) [1985] INSC 88 (16 April 1985)

Judgement Date : april/1985, Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 88 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a British citizen of Indian descent, visited India temporarily for three years starting in July 1966, as he had a family interest in Messrs Atul Drug House Limited. His purpose was to assess the business environment and decide on his future in the country. He brought a Mercedes Benz c...

Gopalakrishna Menon & ANR Vs. D. Raja Reddy & ANR [1983] INSC 113 (5 September 1983)

Judgement Date : september/1983, Citation : 1983 Latest Caselaw 113 SC

Headnote :

The appellants initiated a civil lawsuit against the respondents seeking the recovery of a specific sum of money and submitted several original documents along with the plaint. In response, the first respondent lodged a complaint against the appellants, accusing them of forging his signature on one...

S. L. Goswami Vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur [1978] INSC 238 (23 November 1978)

Judgement Date : november/1978, Citation : 1978 Latest Caselaw 238 SC

Headnote :

Following a complaint from the Additional Registrar of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which alleged that during the preparation of the Paper Book for a Supreme Court appeal, the appellant conspired with two court translators to alter the original deposition of Dr. S. C. Barat (D.W. 1) from a previou...

Ramashraya Chakravarti Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1975] INSC 277 (13 November 1975)

Judgement Date : november/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 275 SC

Headnote :

The appellant served as a Circle organizer in the Tribal Welfare Department, where he was responsible for distributing stipends to adivasi students attending the Tribal Welfare Department School. He misappropriated Rs. 500/- intended for four students and also falsified certain entries in the bills....

Ramnarain Vs. State of Rajasthan [1973] INSC 22 (31 January 1973)

Judgement Date : january/1973, Citation : 1973 Latest Caselaw 22 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was accused of conspiring with others to convince the public to invest money in purchasing residential plots in a village called \'Khand Gawadi\'. To further this conspiracy, they were alleged to have forged sale documents and the signatures of others on these documents. The appellant...

Darshan Singh Ram Kishan Vs. State of Maharashtra [1971] INSC 234 (2 September 1971)

Judgement Date : september/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 234 SC

Headnote :

The police submitted a charge-sheet against the appellant and another individual for various offenses related to the forgery of a British passport. The charges listed against the appellant included sections 419/109, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.), while the other accused faced charge...

Patel Laljibhai Somabhai Vs. The State of Gujarat [1971] INSC 150 (7 May 1971)

Judgement Date : may/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 150 SC

Headnote :

The appellant initiated a lawsuit to recover a specific amount based on a forged cheque. Subsequently, a private complaint was lodged in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate against the appellant and another individual for offenses under sections 467 and 471 of the Penal Code. The Magistrate determi...

Bhanwar Singh & ANR Vs. State of Rajasthan [1967] INSC 289 (5 December 1967)

Judgement Date : december/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 289 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, along with two others, faced charges for participating in a criminal conspiracy that involved the theft of postal orders and cheques during their transit by mail. These items were altered and subsequently cashed at post offices and banks. The charges included violations under section...

Matukdhari Singh & Ors Vs. Janardan Prasad [1965] INSC 139 (20 July 1965)

Judgement Date : july/1965, Citation : 1965 Latest Caselaw 139 SC

Headnote :

The appellants faced trial based on a complaint from the respondent before an Honorary Magistrate for offenses under sections 420, 468, 406, and 465/471 of the Indian Penal Code, but were acquitted. The Magistrate denied the complainant\'s request to frame a charge under section 467 of the Indian Pe...

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Cheemalapati Ganeswara Rao & ANR [1963] INSC 115 (23 April 1963)

Judgement Date : april/1963, Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 139 SC

Headnote :

A and B were jointly tried in a single trial, with A facing charges under sections 120-B, 409, 477-A, and 471 in conjunction with section 476 of the Indian Penal Code, while B was charged under sections 120-B, 409 in conjunction with 109, 298, and 471 in conjunction with 467 of the Indian Penal Code...

G.S.Bansal Vs. The Delhi Administration [1963] INSC 64 (21 March 1963)

Judgement Date : march/1963, Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 64 SC

Headnote :

J, the father of the appellant, had acquired Post Office National Savings Certificates worth Rs. 250 in the name of the Controller of Rationing, which he deposited as security for his ration depot. Later, J sought to have the security released after transferring the ration depot, but he passed away...

Sekendar Sheikh & ANR Vs. State of West Bengal [1963] INSC 24 (8 February 1963)

Judgement Date : february/1963, Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 24 SC

Headnote :

The first appellant faced trial for the crime of forging a valuable security, which is punishable under section 467 of the Indian Penal Code, as well as for the crime of falsely impersonating another individual and submitting a document for registration, punishable under section 82 (c) of the Indian...

R. R. Chari Vs. State of U.P [1962] INSC 113 (28 March 1962)

Judgement Date : march/1962, Citation : 1962 Latest Caselaw 113 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was a permanent employee of the Assam Government, but his services were temporarily assigned to the Central Government. During the relevant period, from December 1945 to September 1946, he served as the Deputy Iron & Steel Controller in Kanpur. He faced charges related to the issuance...

Pramatha Nath Taluqdar Vs. Saroj Ranjan Sarkar [1961] INSC 364 (21 December 1961)

Judgement Date : december/1961, Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 364 SC

Headnote :

On March 17, 1954, Promode Ranjan, the brother of N. R. Sarkar, lodged a complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against Pramathanath and S. M. Basu, accusing them of offenses under Sections 467, 471, and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. This complaint was presented to the Chief P...

Om Prakash Gupta Vs. State of U. P [1957] INSC 2 (11 January 1957)

Judgement Date : january/1957, Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 2 SC

Headnote :

The offenses defined in Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 are separate and distinct. There is no indication that Section 5(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 has repealed Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.This was affir...

Dhirendra Kumar Mandal Vs. The Superintendent [1954] INSC 48 (20 April 1954)

Judgement Date : april/1954, Citation : 1954 Latest Caselaw 48 SC

Headnote :

Trial by jury is certainly one of the most important rights available to an accused individual, yet it is not explicitly guaranteed by the Constitution. Section 269(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure serves as an enabling provision, allowing the State Government to mandate that the trial of all of...

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Cheemalapati Ganeswara Rao & ANR [1963] INSC 115 (23 April 1963)

Judgement Date : april/1963, Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 93 SC

Headnote :

A and B were tried together in a single trial, with A facing charges under Sections 120-B, 409, 477-A, and 471, read with Section 476 of the Indian Penal Code, and B facing charges under Sections 120-B, 409 read with 109, 298, and 471 read with 467 of the Indian Penal Code. The Sessions Judge convic...