Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on IPC Section 193. Punishment for false evidence

Bare Act Title Category / State
IPC Section 193. Punishment for false evidence Criminal Laws
 

List of Judgements

Bhima Razu Prasad Vs. State represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI/SPE/ACUII

Judgement Date : march/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 140 SC

Headnote :

A. Limitation Act, 1963, Sections 14 and 29(2) - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Sections 61 and 239A - Appeal - Limitation - Exclusion of Time - The NCLAT dismissed the respondent\'s objection regarding the appellant\'s delay in filing an appeal against the NCLT\'s order, allowing the appella...

RAJNESH vs. NEHA

Judgement Date : november/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 594 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTInterim Maintenance - Maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.PC shall be granted from the date the application for maintenance is filed.IMPORTANTSubsequent Maintenance Claims - It is essential for the applicant to reveal any prior proceedings and the orders issued in subsequent cases.IMPOR...

TOFAN SINGH vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Judgement Date : october/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 582 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALStatement to Police Officer - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - An officer acting under Section 53 of the NDPS Act is considered a police officer - Any confessional statement made to such officers is not admissible as evidence.A. Constitution of India, 1950, Article 20(3) - Nar...

SATISH CHANDER AHUJA vs. SNEHA AHUJA

Judgement Date : october/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 561 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALDomestic Violence Act - Shared Household - Definition - A shared household does not refer to the household of a joint family of which the husband is a member or in which the husband of the aggrieved person has a share.CRUCIALThe residence of a woman in a household must indicate a degree of pe...

M/S BANDEKAR BROTHERS PVT.LTD. vs. PRASAD VASSUDEV KENI

Judgement Date : september/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 491 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALCreation of False Evidence - A private complaint regarding offenses under Sections 191/192 of the IPC is not valid if the false evidence is fabricated outside the courtroom.A. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 190, 195, and 340, and the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 191, 1...

Sh. Narendra Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of Bihar

Judgement Date : february/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 84 SC

Mahender Chawla Vs. Union of India

Judgement Date : december/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 909 SC

Amit Vashistha Vs. Suresh and Another [August 31, 2017]

Judgement Date : august/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 620 SC

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. M. Sivamani [August 1, 2017]

Judgement Date : august/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 530 SC

Ramesh and Others Vs. State of Haryana [NOVEMBER 22, 2016]

Judgement Date : november/2016, Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 828 SC

Babita Lila & another Vs. Union of India [August 31, 2016]

Judgement Date : august/2016, Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 603 SC

Babita Lila & Another Vs. Union of India [AUGUST 31, 2016]

Judgement Date : august/2016, Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 593 SC

Prem Sagar Manocha Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) [January 6, 2016]

Judgement Date : january/2016, Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 18 SC

Perumal Vs. Janaki [January 20, 2014]

Judgement Date : january/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 36 SC

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India & Ors. [November 22, 2013]

Judgement Date : november/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 804 SC

Sushila Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [September 24, 2013]

Judgement Date : september/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 686 SC

State of Punjab Vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar & Ors. Etc.

Judgement Date : december/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 895 SC

Inderjit Singh Grewal Vs. State of Punjab & ANR.

Judgement Date : august/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 633 SC

Satyavir Singh Rathi Vs. State THR. C.B.I.

Judgement Date : may/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 364 SC

Randhir Singh Vs. State of Haryana & ANR [2000] INSC 6 (6 January 2000)

Judgement Date : january/2000, Citation : 2000 Latest Caselaw 6 SC

P.V. Narasimha Rao Vs. State(Cbi/Spe) [1998] INSC 229 (17 April 1998)

Judgement Date : april/1998, Citation : 1998 Latest Caselaw 229 SC

Afzal & ANR Vs. State of Haryana & Ors [1996] INSC 87 (17 January 1996)

Judgement Date : january/1996, Citation : 1996 Latest Caselaw 85 SC

K.T.M.S. Mohd. & ANR Vs. Union of India [1992] INSC 124 (28 April 1992)

Judgement Date : april/1992, Citation : 1992 Latest Caselaw 124 SC

Headnote :

The Enforcement Directorate in Madras, upon receiving information that appellant-1 was involved in the illegal distribution of funds, conducted a raid at his premises on October 19, 1966, and seized Rs. 4,28,713. On the same day, both appellant-1 and his brother-in-law, appellant-2, were questioned...

Dr. Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. Lentin & Ors [1988] INSC 270 (12 September 1988)

Judgement Date : september/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 267 SC

Headnote :

On February 21, 1986, the Maharashtra State Government appointed Shri Justice B. Lentin as a sole Commission of Inquiry to investigate the deaths of 14 patients at the government-operated J.J.B. Hospital between January 22 and February 7, 1986, following the administration of contaminated glycerol,...

Amrit Nahata Vs. Union of India [1985] INSC131 (8 May 1985)

Judgement Date : may/1985, Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 131 SC

Headnote :

The Petitioner submitted a Writ Petition to this Court seeking a declaration that sections 3 and 6 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and Rules 23 and 25 of the Cinematograph (Censorship) Rules, 1958 are unconstitutional and invalid. The Petitioner also requested a writ of mandamus to compel the respond...

State of Karnataka Vs. Hemareddy Alias Vemareddy & ANR [1981] INSC 18 (27 January 1981)

Judgement Date : january/1981, Citation : 1981 Latest Caselaw 18 SC

Headnote :

Section 195(1)(b)(i) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offense punishable under the sections listed therein (including S. 193 I.P.C.) if the offense is alleged to have occurred in relation to any court proceeding, unless a written complaint is m...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Sk. Bannu And Shankar [1980] INSC 179 (12 September 1980)

Judgement Date : september/1980, Citation : 1980 Latest Caselaw 179 SC

Headnote :

Section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 states that no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under section 205 (among others) of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) when such offence is claimed to have occurred in connection with any proceedings in any Court, unless ther...

Balkishan A. Devidayal Vs. State Of Maharashtra [1980] INSC 142 (31 July 1980)

Judgement Date : july/1980, Citation : 1980 Latest Caselaw 142 SC

Headnote :

In response to the allegations that the appellant in the Criminal Appeal, along with two other accused individuals, possessed railway property obtained through forged railway receipts, the Inspector of the Railway Protection Force filed a complaint against the three, asserting that they were guilty...

S. P. Kohli, Civil Surgeon, Ferozepur Vs. High Court of Punjab & Haryana [1978] INSC 164 (12 September 1978)

Judgement Date : september/1978, Citation : 1978 Latest Caselaw 164 SC

Headnote :

In relation to the offenses under Sections 302 and 376, the Police sought a medical opinion regarding (1) the nature of the injuries on the accused, (2) the accused\'s ability to engage in sexual intercourse, and (3) whether the accused had engaged in sexual intercourse within the last 24-28 hours,...

K. Karunakaran Vs. T. Vs. Eachara Warrier [1977] INSC 217 (16 November 1977)

Judgement Date : november/1977, Citation : 1977 Latest Caselaw 217 SC

Headnote :

The respondent\'s son was a student at the Regional Engineering College in Calicut and lived in the College Hostel. The respondent received a registered letter from the College Principal notifying him that his son, Rajan, had been arrested and taken into police custody. This occurred during the emer...

State of U.P. Vs. Durga Prasad [1974] INSC 155 (23 August 1974)

Judgement Date : august/1974, Citation : 1974 Latest Caselaw 153 SC

Headnote :

The individual in question was employed as a turner at the Railway workshop and was discovered to be in possession of Railway property. The Sub-Inspector of the Railway Protection Force conducted an inquiry into the matter under section 8(1) of the Act. During this inquiry, he recorded statements fr...

Govind Mehta Vs. State of Bihar [1971] INSC 157 (7 May 1971)

Judgement Date : may/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 157 SC

Headnote :

When the appellant learned that transfer applications had been submitted regarding certain cases on his file, he recorded orders on the order sheets of those cases, making serious allegations against the District Magistrate overseeing the transfer applications. He claimed that the District Magistrat...

Percy Rustam Basta Vs. State of Maharashtra [1971] INSC 77 (16 March 1971)

Judgement Date : march/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 77 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was found guilty of offenses under the Customs Act, 1962. He contested the validity of his conviction, arguing that his statement to the customs officials, made in response to a summons issued under section 108 of the Act and which formed a significant basis for the conviction, should...

Hira H. Advani Vs. State of Maharashtra [1969] INSC 179 (13 August 1969)

Judgement Date : august/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 179 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, along with two others, faced prosecution based on a complaint from the Assistant Collector of Customs in Bombay for conspiracy and substantive offenses under section 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act and section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act of 1947. The complaint alleged t...

Mohan Lal Magan Lal Thacker Vs. State of Gujarat [1967] INSC 304 (15 December 1967)

Judgement Date : december/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 304 SC

Headnote :

Following an inquiry under section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Judicial Magistrate in Baroda directed that the appellant be prosecuted for offenses under sections 205, 467, and 468 in conjunction with section 114 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon appeal, the Additional Sessions Judge aff...

Kamla Prasad Singh Vs. Hari Nath Singh & ANR [1967] INSC 130 (27 April 1967)

Judgement Date : april/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 130 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a private individual, submitted three complaints under Section 218 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) against respondent 1, accusing him in each case of abetting offenses committed by three public servants. In each complaint, respondent 1 was co-accused with another individual: in one...

Kuppa Goundan & ANR Vs. M.S.P. Rajesh [1966] INSC 121 (5 May 1966)

Judgement Date : may/1966, Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 121 SC

Headnote :

During a trial, the appellants provided testimony against the respondent. Following the trial\'s conclusion, the respondent submitted a petition to the Magistrate\'s court under section 476(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, requesting the prosecution of the appellants for perjury under section 193...

Baban Singh & ANR Vs. Jagdish Singh & Ors [1966] INSC 38 (8 February 1966)

Judgement Date : february/1966, Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 38 SC

Headnote :

The appellants submitted affidavits in the High Court, claiming they had not received any money as part of a compromise in a first appeal that was ongoing in that Court. In response, the High Court directed the Registrar to conduct an inquiry. After gathering evidence from both parties, the Registra...

Dr. S. Dutt Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [1965] INSC 159 (18 August 1965)

Judgement Date : august/1965, Citation : 1965 Latest Caselaw 159 SC

Headnote :

The appellant served as a forensic expert in a sessions trial, claiming to possess a diploma in criminology, which he presented to the Sessions Judge when requested. Based on his testimony, the accused were acquitted. Following allegations that the diploma was forged, the prosecution sought the Sess...

Lalji Haridas Vs. State of Maharashtra & ANR [1964] INSC 31 (7 February 1964)

Judgement Date : february/1964, Citation : 1964 Latest Caselaw 31 SC

Headnote :

The appellant lodged a criminal complaint against respondent No. 2, claiming that he had violated section 193 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by providing false testimony in certain proceedings before the Income-tax Officer under section 37 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Respondent No. 2 raised...

Babu Lal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors [1963] INSC 192 (18 September 1963)

Judgement Date : september/1963, Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 220 SC

Headnote :

In a civil case, the appellant was called as a witness and presented an agreement that the Munsiff believed to be forged. However, the Munsiff did not document the necessary opinion to initiate prosecution of the appellant under section 479A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in his judgment. Before...

Raghubir Prosad Dudhewalla Vs. Chamanlal Mehra & ANR [1963] INSC 153 (10 May 1963)

Judgement Date : may/1963, Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 181 SC

Headnote :

The appellant served as a prosecution witness against the respondents, who were ultimately acquitted. Following this, an application was submitted under section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the Magistrate, seeking to file a complaint against the appellant and several other prosecution wi...

Shabir Hussein Bholu Vs. State of Maharashtra [1962] INSC 273 (28 September 1962)

Judgement Date : september/1962, Citation : 1962 Latest Caselaw 273 SC

Headnote :

The appellant testified as a witness in a murder jury trial. During his testimony, he provided a statement that contradicted his earlier statement made before the committing court. After the trial concluded and the judgment was delivered, the Sessions judge issued a separate order to prosecute the a...

Ranjit Singh Vs. The State of Punjab [1959] INSC 42 (21 April 1959)

Judgement Date : april/1959, Citation : 1959 Latest Caselaw 42 SC

Headnote :

A habeas corpus petition was submitted to the High Court, claiming that an individual named S had been unlawfully arrested and held in custody without any charges or a remand from a Magistrate. In response, the appellant, a police sub-inspector, submitted a false affidavit denying the claims made in...

Kuldip Singh Vs. The State of Punjab & ANR [1956] INSC 13 (15 February 1956)

Judgement Date : february/1956, Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 13 SC

Headnote :

The determination of which Court is authorized to file a complaint under section 476-A in conjunction with section 195(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in cases where no complaint has been made by the Court where the offense occurred or its successor, hinges on the type of proceeding in which t...

Shri Virindar Kumar Satyawadi Vs. The State of Punjab [1955] INSC 67 (22 November 1955)

Judgement Date : november/1955, Citation : 1955 Latest Caselaw 67 SC

Headnote :

It was determined that a Returning Officer, when acting under sections 33 and 36 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and making decisions regarding the validity of a nomination paper, does not qualify as a court as defined by sections 195(1)(b), 476, and 476-B of the Code of Criminal Proce...

M. S. Sheriff Vs. The State of Madras & Ors [1954] INSC 30 (18 March 1954)

Judgement Date : march/1954, Citation : 1954 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Headnote :

It was determined that an appeal is valid before the Supreme Court under section 476B of the Code of Criminal Procedure against an order from a Division Bench of a High Court that mandates the filing of a perjury complaint.Additionally, it was concluded that pursuing both civil and criminal cases co...