Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958

Bare Act Title Category / State
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 Intellectual Property Laws
 

List of Judgements

Cryogas Equipment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Inox India Ltd. and Ors.

Judgement Date : april/2025, Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 363 SC

Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. Vs. B. Vijaya Sai

Judgement Date : january/2022, Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 68 SC

Kalpana Mehta and others Vs. Union of India and others [MAY 09, 2018]

Judgement Date : may/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 359 SC

Satnam Overseas Vs. Sant Ram & Co. & ANR. [November 22, 2013]

Judgement Date : november/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 808 SC

Suresh Dhanuka Vs. Sunita Mohapatra

Judgement Date : december/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 885 SC

Infosys Technologies Ltd. Vs. Jupiter Infosys Ltd. & ANR (November 9, 2010)

Judgement Date : november/2010, Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 832 SC

M. Gurudas & Ors Vs. Rasaranjan & Ors [2006] Insc 585 (13 September 2006)

Judgement Date : september/2006, Citation : 2006 Latest Caselaw 585 SC

M/S. Dhodha House Vs. S.K. Maingi [2005] INSC 695 (15 December 2005)

Judgement Date : december/2005, Citation : 2005 Latest Caselaw 691 SC

American Home Products Corporation Vs. Mac Laboratories Private Limited & ANR [1985] INSC 211 (30 September 1985)

Judgement Date : september/1985, Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 211 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, American Home Products Corporation, is a corporation established in the United States of America.One of its operations includes the production and marketing of pharmaceutical products and drugs through its division known as \"Whitehall Laboratories\". The appellant engaged with the In...

Vishwa Mitter Vs. O. P. Poddar & Ors [1983] INSC 139 (30 September 1983)

Judgement Date : september/1983, Citation : 1983 Latest Caselaw 139 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, acting as a dealer of beedies and as the authorized representative of the firm that produces a specific brand of beedies, lodged a complaint claiming that the respondents committed offenses under sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and section 420 of the In...

Sumat Prasad Jain Vs. Sheojanam Prasad & Ors [1972] INSC 200 (29 August 1972)

Judgement Date : august/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 200 SC

Headnote :

S., the respondent who passed away while the appeal was pending before the High Court, developed a formula for a fragrance called \'Basant Bahar\', which gained significant popularity. S. applied for the registration of the Trade Mark, but the application was denied due to certain technical issues.T...

Amar Chandra Chakraborty Vs. Collector of Excise, Government of Tripura & Ors [1972] INSC 136 (3 May 1972)

Judgement Date : may/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 136 SC

Headnote :

The appellant received a license from the Excise Collector on March 13, 1968, to set up a warehouse for the bonded storage and wholesale sale of country spirit through import, intended for distribution to excise vendors in Tripura. This license was valid for five years, starting from April 1, 1968,...

Parle Products (P) Ltd. Vs. J. P. & Co. Mysore [1972] INSC 30 (28 January 1972)

Judgement Date : january/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Headnote :

The appellants initiated legal action seeking an injunction to prevent the respondents from infringing upon their registered trademark, which is used on the biscuit packets they produce. However, both the trial court and the High Court dismissed the suit.Upon granting the appeal to this Court,

State of U.P. Vs. Ram Nath, Partner M/S. Panna Lal Durga Prasad, Kanpur [1971] INSC 322 (24 November 1971)

Judgement Date : november/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 322 SC

Headnote :

The Inspector of Trademarks sent a letter to the Magistrate, urging him to take appropriate legal action against the respondents. The allegations stated that the respondents were manufacturing coins and gold pieces while using a trademark that was deceptively similar to a bank\'s registered trademar...

National Bell Co. & ANR Vs. Metal Goods Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd. & ANR [1970] INSC 70 (18 March 1970)

Judgement Date : march/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 70 SC

Headnote :

For several years leading up to 1952, cycle bells produced by Lucas and other foreign manufacturers, marked with the number \'50\' and other digits, were available in the Indian market. After 1952, the importation of foreign bells was banned, and while some foreign-made bells with the numeral \'50\'...

K. R. Chinna Krishna Chettiar Vs. Sri Ambal & Co., Madras & ANR [1969] INSC 110 (14 April 1969)

Judgement Date : april/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 110 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was the sole owner of a business named Radha & Co., while the respondents, Ambal & Co., operated as a partnership. Both the appellant and the respondents were involved in the manufacturing and selling of snuff, conducting their business in Madras and engaging in activities both within...

Ram Kishore Vs. State of U.P [1966] INSC 89 (28 March 1966)

Judgement Date : march/1966, Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 89 SC

Headnote :

In 1955, the complainants raised concerns with the appellant regarding his infringement of their trademark, but they did not take any further action at that time. In November 1960, the appellant was discovered to be in possession of labels and tobacco tins that bore marks strikingly similar to the c...

Raja Soap Factory & Ors Vs. S. P. Shantharaj & Ors [1965] INSC 10 (20 January 1965)

Judgement Date : january/1965, Citation : 1965 Latest Caselaw 10 SC

Headnote :

The respondents filed a passing off lawsuit in the High Court of Mysore, seeking a declaration of their exclusive ownership of a specific trademark and a permanent injunction to prevent the appellants from misrepresenting their goods as those of the respondents. According to section 105 of the Trade...