The Supreme Court on December 20, 2024, set aside the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s (NCDRC) 2008 decision that had capped the interest rates on credit card dues at 30%. The verdict came in response to a petition filed by HSBC against the NGO Awaz Foundation, which had challenged the exorbitant interest rates being levied by banks.
The NCDRC’s earlier judgment, passed on July 7, 2008, had been a major blow to financial institutions, as it held that charging annual interest rates between 36% to 49% was exploitative. The consumer forum had termed these practices "unfair trade practices," citing the excessive burden placed on consumers who failed to make full payments on their credit card dues. It had also set a 30% cap on credit card interest rates, stating that anything beyond this threshold was considered usurious.
The Commission also pointed out that penal interest could only be levied once for a default period and should not be compounded, while monthly rest charges were also deemed exploitative. These decisions were based on the premise that the high interest rates placed undue financial burden on consumers, particularly given the lack of regulatory oversight at the time. In its appeal, the banks contested the NCDRC's jurisdiction to impose such restrictions, arguing that it interfered with their operational autonomy.
The Commission's ruling had been based on concerns that banks were imposing excessively high interest rates on credit card holders, many of whom were financially vulnerable and had limited bargaining power. It highlighted the lack of clear regulatory oversight from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to cap such rates. Notably, the NCDRC emphasized the need for a national regulatory framework to prevent exploitation, pointing out that some states had laws to curb moneylenders from charging exorbitant rates, but no such restriction existed for banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs).
The NCDRC's order was based on a comparative analysis of global credit card interest rates. It found that in developed countries such as the USA, UK, and Australia, the interest rates ranged from 9.99% to 24%, far lower than what was being charged in India. By contrast, countries with emerging markets, such as the Philippines, Indonesia, and Mexico, saw interest rates that went as high as 50%. The Commission’s stance was that there was no justification for adopting the highest rates seen in smaller economies when developed nations maintained lower, more reasonable charges.
However, a bench of Justice Bela Trivedi and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, while delivering the verdict on Friday, disagreed with the NCDRC's reasoning. The Court ruled that the order should be set aside, effectively lifting the 30% cap on credit card interest rates. The Court’s decision was succinct: "In view of foregoing reasons the judgment of NCDRC is set aside."
Picture Source :
