Today, the Supreme Court has clarified an important aspect of arbitration law by holding that when a party files an application under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 begins only after that application is decided. The ruling addresses a recurring procedural issue concerning the computation of limitation in arbitration matters.
The dispute arose from land acquisition for a national highway project in Karnataka. After a fresh arbitral award was passed in 2022, both parties filed applications under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act. These applications were dismissed by the Arbitrator on 4 July 2022. Thereafter, the Appellant filed applications under Section 34 challenging the award. While the District Court condoned the delay, the Karnataka High Court held that the challenge was time-barred and set aside the condonation order.
The Appellant argued that limitation under Section 34 could only commence after disposal of the Section 33 applications. The Respondent contended that the Appellant's Section 33 application was not maintainable and therefore could not extend the limitation period.
Allowing the appeal, the Supreme Court observed that “The said provision does not distinguish between the applications which are ultimately allowed or dismissed. The said provision also does not indicate that only an application which is maintainable under Section 33 of the Act would defer the commencement of litigation under Section 34(3) of the Act.”
The Court further stated that “Consequently, the limitation prescribed under Section 34(3) can start only from the date on which the proceedings under Section 33 are disposed of.”
The Supreme Court set aside the Karnataka High Court's judgment and restored the District Court's order condoning the delay. It held that the Section 34 applications were filed within the prescribed period when limitation was calculated from the date of disposal of the Section 33 applications. The matter will now be decided on merits.
Case Title: National Highway Authority of India v. T. Younis & Anr.
Case No.: Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 7570 of 2024
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe
Advocate for the Appellant: Ms. Pinky Anand, Senior Advocate
Advocate for the Respondent: Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain, Senior Advocate
Read Judgment @LatestLaws.com
Picture Source :
