Recently, the Himachal Pradesh High Court examined an important service law dispute concerning promotion rights within the Anganwadi system, where the core question was whether an administrative transfer granted on the ground of marriage could override a long-serving employee’s legitimate chance of career advancement. The issue arose from an Anganwadi Centre, where a helper with more than two decades of service claimed that her rightful opportunity for promotion was effectively sidelined after another worker was transferred to the same post following her marriage. The situation prompted the Court to closely scrutinize the limits of such administrative transfers and their impact on the principle of legitimate expectation in public employment.
The controversy began when Sujata Devi, who had been serving as an Anganwadi Helper at Anganwadi Centre since August 2000, sought promotion after the post of Anganwadi Worker fell vacant in April 2024. Relying on a 2010 government notification governing the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme, she argued that Rule 5 grants the Anganwadi Helper at the same centre the first opportunity to be appointed as a Worker if she meets the educational qualifications.
However, matters took a turn when Tara Devi was transferred to the same centre in July 2024 following her marriage in the village, effectively occupying the vacancy. Challenging the Single Judge’s order directing Sujata Devi’s promotion, Tara Devi approached the Division Bench through a Letters Patent Appeal, contending that Rule 4 of the same notification permits adjustment of Anganwadi Workers or Helpers at the place of the husband’s residence after marriage.
The Division Bench of Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Bipin C. Negi closely examined the interplay between the two rules and emphasized that administrative adjustments cannot undermine an employee’s legitimate promotional prospects. The Court noted that Sujata Devi had rendered more than 24 years of service at the same centre and that the vacancy had arisen in April 2024, giving her a clear right to be considered for promotion under the applicable rules.
The Bench held that “The right of consideration for promotion is a legitimate expectation of an employee which could not have been taken away on account of a transfer order, only on a ground of marriage and is not mandatory but only recommendatory.” Observing that the transfer effectively defeated the petitioner’s promotional opportunity, the Court concluded that the Single Judge’s reasoning was sound and consequently dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the direction to grant promotion to the writ petitioner.
Case Title: Tara Devi Vs. State of HP & Ors.
Case No.: LPA No. 837 of 2025
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Chief Justice. G.S. Sandhawalia, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin C. Negi,
Advocate for the Petitioner: Adv. Devender Kumar,
Advocate for the Respondent: DAG Priyanka Chauhan,
Read Judgment @Latestlaws.com
Picture Source :
