Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

HARDEEP SINGH vs. GURBACHAN SINGH
2019 Latest Caselaw 1180 SC

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1180 SC
Judgement Date : 02 Dec 2019

    
Headnote :

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 20 - Specific performance of a sales agreement - Settlement - The plaintiff initiated a lawsuit for specific performance, which was granted by the trial court. The judgment and order were affirmed by the High Court. The parties reached an amicable settlement during the appeal at the Supreme Court, leading to the disposal of the appeal based on their agreement.



[Para 8]

 

Before :- R. Banumathi and A.S. Bopanna, JJ.

Civil Appeal Nos. 9158 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C)No.5148 of 2017). D/d. 2.12.2019.

Hardeep Singh & Anr. - Appellants

Versus

Gurbachan Singh & Anr. - Respondents

For the Appellants :- Vijay Hansaria, Sr.Adv., Ms. Sneha Kalita, Advocate.

For the Respondents :- R.S. Suri, Sr.Adv., Ms. Dipika Jain, Abhishek Singh, Advocates.

ORDER

R. Banumathi, J. - Leave granted.

2. The appellants-defendants have entered into an Agreement to Sell with respect to the suit property on 26.04.1999 for a sum of L 5,75,000/-. An advance of L 1,52,000/- was paid by the respondent no.1-plaintiff. Since the appellants-plaintiffs had not executed the sale deed, respondent no.1 filed Suit NO.1652 of 2003 for specific performance of the Agreement to Sell dated 26.04.1999. By the judgment dated 22.11.2012, the Trial Court decreed the said suit. The first appeal preferred by Appellants-defendants in Civil Appeal no.34 of 2013 was came to be dismissed by the Additional District Judge. Being aggrieved, the appellants-defendants have filed the second appeal before the High Court in R.S.A. NO.2126 of 2016 which also came to be dismissed. Being aggrieved by the concurrent findings by all the three courts below, the appellants-defendants have filed this appeal.

3. During the course of hearing the appellants-defendants have negotiated for settlement and the parties have amicably settled the matter. The parties have, in addition to the agreed sale consideration i.e. an amount of L 5,75,000/-, the respondent no.1-plaintiff ought to pay a further amount of L 12,50,000/-, as noted in the Order dated 30.09.2019 that the respondent no.1-plaintiff have paid a sum of L 5,00,000/- by Demand Draft No.184218 dated 21.09.2019 which was handed over to appellant no.1-Hardeep Singh in the open court.

4. We have heard Mr. Vijay Hansaria, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr. R.S. Suri, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent no.1 and also perused the impugned judgment and materials on record.

5. Today i.e. 02.12.2019 when the matter has been called for hearing, the balance amount of L 7,50,000/- has been paid by respondent no.1 to the appellants by way of Demand Draft No.184234 dated 21.11.2019 which has been received by appellant no.1-Hardeep Singh who is present in the Court in-person.

6. It is stated by learned senior counsel for the parties that by the proceedings of the Sale Deed has already been executed on 23.12.2015 in favour of respondent-plaintiff.

7. Today, the appellants have handed over the original Sale Deed executed on 22.09.2004 in favour of appellant no.2-Mohan Singh by respondent no.2-Town Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, and the same has been received by respondent no.1-plaintiff.

8. The amount of L 4,22,550/- deposited by respondent no.1 before the Additional Civil Judge, Ludhiana, shall be paid to appellant No.1-Hardeep Singh along with the accrued interest, if any. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter and the fact that appellant no.1-Hardeep Singh has already received the additional amount of L 12,50,000/-, the appellants are directed to apply to the Town Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, for transfer of the suit property to respondent no.1-plaintiff. On such application being made, the Town Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders.

9. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties, the appeal is disposed of.

10. The parties shall be at liberty to make a representation before the Town Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, for waiving the non-construction fine and the same shall be considered by the concerned Trust in accordance with law.

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter