Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahabir Prasad Jalan & ANR. Vs. Satish Deora [2009] INSC 726 (13 April 2009)
2009 Latest Caselaw 351 SC

Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 351 SC
Judgement Date : Apr/2009

    

Mahabir Prasad Jalan & ANR. Vs. Satish Deora [2009] INSC 726 (13 April 2009)

Judgment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2381 OF 2009 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8329 of 2008) Mahabir Prasad Jalan & Anr. ..........Appellant Versus Satish Deora ........Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2382 OF 2009 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 19209 of 2008) Mahabir Prasad Jalan & Anr. ..........Appellant Versus Satish Deora ........Respondent

ORDER

1.     Leave granted in both these special leave petitions.

2.     Appellant's application filed before the trial court in T.S. No. 23 of 2001, for issuance of a direction to the defendant therein, is rejected by the trial court and the same is confirmed by the High Court by dismissing the Revisional Application C.O. No. 3410 of 2007 dated 1.10.2007.

3.     3) The appellant by filing application under Section 151 of C.P.C. in T.S. No. 23 of 2001, had sought for a direction to the defendant in the Civil Suit to pay rent/compensation at the enhanced rate.

4.     At the time of hearing of this appeal, Shri S.N. Mukherjee, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent herein, on instructions; very fairly submits that the respondent herein would pay an amount of Rs.31,656.04 and Rs. 38, 961.08 in both these appeals, respectively, commencing from 5th of April, 2009, subject to the result of the Civil Suit pending before the trial court between the parties.

5.     Shri Vijay Hansaria, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, has no objection to the suggestion made by learned Senior Counsel for the respondent.

6.     In view of the above, it may not be necessary for us to go into the issues raised by the parties in this appeal. Accordingly, we dispose of the appeals, by directing the respondent herein to pay an amount of Rs. 31,656.04 and Rs. 38, 961.08 by way of rent/compensation for the two premises in their occupation during the pendency of the Civil Suit commencing from 5th of April, 2009, and also subject to the result of the suit/s. Appeals are disposed of.

7.     We place on record our deep appreciation to the efforts made by the learned Senior Counsel Shri S.N. Mukherjee in amicably settling the matter.

.......................................J. [ TARUN CHATTERJEE ]

.......................................J. [ H.L. DATTU ]

New Delhi, April 13, 2009.

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter