Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chimajitao Kanhojirao Shirke & ANR Vs. Oriental Fire & Genera Insurance Co. Ltd. [2000] INSC 383 (26 July 2000)
2000 Latest Caselaw 380 SC

Citation : 2000 Latest Caselaw 380 SC
Judgement Date : Jul/2000

    

Chimajitao Kanhojirao Shirke & ANR Vs. Oriental Fire & Genera Insurance Co. Ltd. [2000] Insc 383 (26 July 2000)

A.P.Misra, Ruma Pal

L.I.T.J The short question raised in this appeal 1s whether the words "unlimied personal Injury and property damage" upto Rs. 10 lakhs for which premium of Rs. 134/- was paid as recorded In the Insurance policy itself covers the dearth and bodily lnjury of the "insured or not. According to the statement on behalf of the appellants, who are the claimants before us, the language used therein clearly Indicates that the insured would also be covered under It, while submission on behalf of the Insurance company is, this only co-relates to the damage of the property and has no correlation with the personal injury or death of the insured.

The short facts are that the apoellant filed a suit for recovery of Rs, 6,03;000/- from the defendant-respondent, insurance company. The appellants are the parents of the rjeceased Mahendra Shirke, who died in the accident on 8th January, 1980. The said deceased obtained loan from Maharashtra Finance Corporation and Bank of Baroda under "educated Unemployment Scheme" for purchasing goods truck In the year 1977. He obtained the said loan under the condition that. he will drive personally the said truck.

According to the appellants" case, the deceased Mahendra insured his truck with the respondents to the tune of Rs.

10 lakhs, which 1s a cornorehensive Insurance covering risks for unlimited personal injury and property. ' The said truck was also Insured as per the policy to the tune of Rs.

1,27,000/- for the damage to the property. It 1s not In dispute that on the date of the accident the said truck was covered with the said Insurance policy. In fact; the question which we have to decide 1s the Interpretation.of the policy Itself.

On these facts, the trial court decreed the suit in favour of the appellants for the aforesaid amount alongwith interest @ 12% per annum. The Trial Court while considering Issues No. 1 and 9 after considaring the submissions of both the parties concludes that the payment of Rs. 134/- as premium was for the unlimited personal Injury to the life of the insured as well as to the property to the tune of Rs.

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter