Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 272 UK
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Criminal Appeal No. 300 of 2025
With
IA No.1 of 2025 For Bail Application
Raeesh ...... Appellant
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand ..... Respondent
Present:
Mr. Tajhar Qayyum, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Mehboob Rahi,
Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Instant criminal appeal is preferred against
the judgment and order dated 11.04.2025, passed in
Sessions Trial No.188 of 2011, State Vs. Raseed Ahmad
and Others, by the court of Second Additional Sessions
Judge, Udham Singh Nagar. By it, the appellant has
been convicted and sentenced under Section 411 IPC.
2. Heard.
3. Admit.
4. It is submitted that in the same impugned
order, Lower Court Record has already been summoned.
5. Heard on bail application (IA No.1 of 2025).
6. Learned counsel for the appellant would
submit that co-convict has already been granted bail.
7. Learned State Counsel admits this fact.
8. Having considered, this Court is of the view
that it is a case in which the execution of sentence
should be suspended and the appellant be enlarged on
bail.
9. The bail application is allowed.
10. The sentence appealed against is suspended
during the pendency of the appeal.
11. The appellant be released on bail during the
pendency of the appeal on his executing a personal bond
and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like
amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
12. List the criminal appeal for final hearing along
with CRLA No.282 of 2025.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 09.05.2025 Ravi Bisht
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!