Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2531 UK
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 914 of 2025 (M/S)
Kuldeep Singh ..........Petitioner
Vs.
Prabhjot Kaur ...........Respondent
Present : Mr. Mohd. Azim, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohd. Umar, for the respondent.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The petitioner seeks directions that the
Matrimonial Case No.384 of 2024, Kuldeep Singh vs.
Prabhjot Kaur, under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage
Act, 1955 ("the Act"), pending in the court of Judge,
Family Court, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar
("the case") be decided expeditiously.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would
submit that the parties stay abroad. Therefore, the matter
may be decided expeditiously.
4. In some cases when petitions for expeditious
disposal are preferred, the Court considers the
circumstances and at times observing that every court
should ensure expeditious disposal, matters are disposed
of. Rarely the courts fixes any time frame for disposal of a
case, but instance is a very strange case. When the
matter is taken up, on behalf of respondent also,
representation has been made. The chronology of the case
is as follows:-
a) On 07.09.2024, the petition under Section 13-B(1) of
the Act was preferred. When the court fixed
10.03.2025, the next date. On that date, the
petitioner filed his evidence. Evidence was closed
and the matter was fixed for argument on
18.03.2025.
b) On 18.03.2025, the counsel represented the parties
moved an adjournment application and 19.03.2025
was the date fixed.
c) On 19.03.2025 again, the parties appeared and
moved adjournment application and now, the date
fixed is 03.05.2025.
5. On the one hand, the petitioner is seeking
adjournment in the case and on the other hand, here is
an application for expeditious disposal of the case. This is
nothing, but totally abuse of the process of law. Such type
of petitions should be discouraged. Therefore, this Court
proposes to dismiss the instant petition with some costs.
6. The petition is dismissed with costs of
`20,000/-. The costs shall be deposited by the petitioner
within a period of three weeks from today. In case, if it is
not deposited, it shall be recovered as an arrears of land
revenue and Registry shall proceed to recover the same.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 28.03.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!