Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Heera Lal vs Uttarakhand Transport Corporation
2025 Latest Caselaw 470 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 470 UK
Judgement Date : 2 June, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

Heera Lal vs Uttarakhand Transport Corporation on 2 June, 2025

Author: Ravindra Maithani
Bench: Ravindra Maithani
    HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
                     Writ Petition (S/S) No.861 of 2025

Heera Lal                                                     ...Petitioner

                                     Versus


Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun
And others                                               ....Respondents


Present:
             Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
             Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the respondents.

Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)

By means of instant petition, the petitioner has sought

the following reliefs:-

"(i) Issue a writ or certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 9.2.2022 passed by respondent no.3 to the extent that an amount of Rs.2,39,217/- has been deducted from the payment of gratuity (Contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition).

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to return back the amount of arrears to the petitioner towards 2nd ACP which is recovered from the payment of gratuity to the tune of Rs.2,39,217/- along with 10% interest which is actual payment and also pay the cost of Rs.5000/-

which is given in the Writ Petition No. 1593 of 2021 (S/S) "Balam Singh Aswal Vs Managing Director and others" and the same judgment was affirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Uttarakhand Transport Corporation and others Vs Ashok Kumar Saxena.

(iii) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

(iv) To award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner."

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

record.

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment

dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in

Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand

Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others and other connected

matters.

4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel.

5. Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in

terms of the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division

Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022, Managing

Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others

and other connected matters.

(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 02.06.2025 Jitendra

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter