Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPSS/1140/2025
2025 Latest Caselaw 920 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 920 UK
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

WPSS/1140/2025 on 15 July, 2025

Author: Ravindra Maithani
Bench: Ravindra Maithani
                Office Notes,
             reports, orders or
SL.           proceedings or
      Date                                       COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No             directions and
             Registrar's order
              with Signatures
D1-
54                                WPSS No.1140 of 2025
                                  Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Mr. Pankaj Miglani and Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent no.1.

Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate for the respondent no.3.

Heard.

Admit.

Learned C.S.C. takes notices for the respondent no.1.

Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate takes notices for the respondent no.3.

Issue notices to the respondent no.2, returnable within six weeks.

Steps to be taken within a week. Respondents may file counter affidavit within four weeks.

Two weeks, thereafter, rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed.

List this matter on 23.09.2025. Heard on Stay Application, IA No.1 of

It is the case of the petitioner that she has been working with the respondent no.2 establishment since 2015; her services need to be regularised, which has not been done. Her services ought to have been regularized in view of the judgment passed by this Court in WPSB No.616 of 2018, Narendra Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand.

It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner claim for regularization, but no decision has been taken on it.

By means of the stay application, the petitioner seeks directions that the respondents may be directed not disturb the petitioner from discharging his duties Having considered, as an interim measure, till the next date of listing, the respondent authorities are directed not to disturb the services of the petitioner till a decision is taken on the regularization application. At the same time, she shall not be replaced by any other outsource person.

Stay application stands disposed of, accordingly.

(Ravindra Maithani J.) 15.07.2025 RV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter