Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2181 UK
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 554 of 2025 (M/S)
Sandeep ..........Petitioner
Vs.
Bank of Maharashtra and others ........ Respondents
Present : Mr. Shakib Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The challenge is made to an e-Auction Sale
Notice dated 26.07.2024, issued by the respondents
under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002
("the SARFAESI Act").
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would
submit that petitioner had taken a loan of `27 Lacs. But,
the respondents-bank sanctioned `40 Lacs and got it
deposited in his account, but subsequently, withdrew `18
Lacs.
4. What is challenged in the proceedings is
under the SARFAESI Act. The SARFAESI Act is self
contained Act under Section 17 of the SARFAESI
Act, the petitioner has every occasion to challenge
the action, by which, the petitioner is aggrieved.
Therefore, there is no reason to entertain the instant
petition. Accordingly, the petition deserves to be
dismissed at the stage of admission itself.
5. The petition is dismissed in limine.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 24.02.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!