Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPMS/3396/2025
2025 Latest Caselaw 5928 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5928 UK
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2025

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/3396/2025 on 8 December, 2025

Author: Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench: Manoj Kumar Tiwari
                                                                    2025:UHC:10881
              Office Notes,
             reports, orders
             or proceedings
SL.
      Date    or directions                 COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
No.
             and Registrar's
               order with
               Signatures
                               WPMS/3394/2025
                               With
                               WPMS/3396/2025
                               Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Mohd. Matlub, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State.

2. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, therefore they are heard together and are being decided by a common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of Writ Petition No. 3394 of 2025 (MS) alone are being discussed and considered.

3. Petitioners are running institution where religious teachings are imparted. By means of these writ petitions, petitioners have sought a direction to the authorities to permanently unseal the premises of the institution run by them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical issue was decided by this Court in Writ Petition No. 835 of 2025 (MS) and other connected petitions, therefore, these petitions be decided in terms of the said judgment.

5. Learned State Counsel fairly concedes that the issue decided in that writ petition covers the issue raised by petitioners in these petitions, 2025:UHC:10881 therefore, he has no objection if these petitions are decided in terms of the said judgment.

6. Accordingly, writ petitions are decided in terms of judgment dated 26.08.2025, rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 835 of 2025 (MS).

7. Petitioners shall give undertaking before the concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate that they will neither run Madarsa nor use the expression 'Madarsa' in the name of institution run by them till the time their institution is duly registered/recognized by Uttarakhand Madarsa Education Board.

8. It is made clear that if petitioners fail to abide by the undertaking given by them or if they are found unauthorisedly using the expression 'Madarsa' in the name of institution run by them, the authorities shall be free to take necessary action against the petitioners.

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 08.12.2025 Mahinder/

MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.12.08 17:15:25 +05'30' 2025:UHC:10881

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter