Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3861 UK
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 1063 of 2025 (M/S)
Chandra Shekhar Joshi ..........Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and another ........ Respondents
Present : Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
By means of the instant petition, the petitioner claims
that he is in possession of a land, plot No.245/3 admeasuring
0.632 Hectare, situated in Village Savaldeh, Tehsil Ramnagar,
District Nainital for a long time. As per Government Policy, the land
should be regularized in his favour, but it is not being done despite
multiple representations given by the petitioner.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that
the decision is to be taken by the respondent no.2/the Collector
Nainital, but he has been reporting the matter to the respondent
no.1/State and last communication was made by the respondent
no.2 on 25.01.2023 (Annexure No.12). He would submit that the
respondents may be directed to take a decision in the matter, in
view of the Government Policy.
4. Learned State counsel gives statement that the decision
may be taken in the matter within a period of two months from
today.
5. The Court takes on record the statement given by the
learned State counsel.
6. The writ petition stands disposed of with the direction
to the respondents to take a decision in the matter within a period
of two months from today.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 24.04.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!