Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3533 UK
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 359 of 2025 (S/S)
Chandramohan Naithani ..........Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others ........ Respondents
Present : Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent
nos.1 to 5.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The petitioner has challenged the pay fixation
orders.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the
petitioner would submit that the matter is squarely
covered by the judgment dated 13.08.2021, passed by
this Court in Writ Petition No.609 of 2020 (S/S),
Ramchandra Tomar vs. State of Uttarakhand and others
and connected cases.
4. Learned State counsel admits that the issue is
covered by the judgment dated 13.08.2021, passed by
this Court in Writ Petition No.609 of 2020 (S/S),
Ramchandra Tomar vs. State of Uttarakhand and others
and connected cases. He would also submit that similar
controversy has also decided on 05.01.2024 in Writ
Petition No.1600 of 2022 (S/S), Yatendra Singh Rana Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others, and connected cases.
5. Since, the matter is covered, instant petition is
decided in terms of the judgment dated 13.08.2021,
passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.609 of 2020
(S/S), Ramchandra Tomar vs. State of Uttarakhand and
others and connected cases.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 03.04.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!