Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 217 UK
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VIVEK BHARTI SHARMA
WRIT PETITION (M/S) NO. 1829 OF 2021
01ST MARCH, 2024
M/s Bhilangana Hydro Power Ltd. .....Petitioner.
Versus
Uttarakhand Electricity Regulatory Commission & another
....Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioner : None.
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Mr. Maneesh Bisht, proxy counsel
for Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned
counsel.
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned
counsel.
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ms. Ritu Bahri)
Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel, on instructions
from Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.1,
states that the representation of the petitioner has been decided
by the authorities in its favour.
2. Keeping in view this statement, the writ petition is
being disposed of.
3. However, it is made clear that if any cause of action
survives, the petitioner can file an application for recall of the
order, within a period of one month.
4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(RITU BAHRI, C.J.)
(VIVEK BHARTI SHARMA, J.) Dated: 01st March, 2024 NISHANT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!