Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5 UK
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2024
Office Notes,
reports, orders
Sl. or proceedings
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No. or directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
C482 No. 72 of 2015
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, A.C.J.
(1) None present for the applicant.
(2) Mr. Bhaskar Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the
State of Uttarakhand.
(3) This application under Section 482
Cr.P.C. was disposed of by coordinate Bench
vide order dated 14.08.2015. An application
seeking recall of the said order was moved by
respondent no. 3.
(4) This Court does not find any reason to recall the judgment and order dated 14.08.2015. Even otherwise also, review of an order is not permissible under these proceedings, as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Atul Shukla v. State of M.P. & another, reported in 2019 (17) SCC
299. Relevant para of the said judgment is extracted below:-
"7. The High Court while dismissing the petition under Section 482 observed that it would be open to the second respondent to pursue his remedies after framing of the charge. In view of the specific bar which is contained in Section 362, we are of the view that the impugned order [Surendra Singh v. State of M.P., 2018 SCC OnLine MP 1424] of the High Court is unsustainable. Such an application for review or modification could not have been entertained."
(5) Accordingly, recall application (MCRC No. 31 of 2016) is rejected.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, A.C.J.) 02.01.2024 Aswal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!