Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1314 UK
Judgement Date : 10 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 209 OF 2019
10TH MAY, 2023
Between:
Vinod Kumar Pande ...... Petitioner
and
Union of India & others ...... Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 211 OF 2019
Between:
Ajay Singh Rawat ...... Petitioner
and
Union of India & another ...... Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 216 OF 2019
Between:
Reenu Paul ...... Petitioner
and
State of Uttarakhand & another ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht and Mr.
Abhijay Negi, learned counsels in
WPPIL No. 211 of 2019 & WPPIL
No. 216 of 2019
2
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. Aazmeen Sheikh, learned
Standing Counsel for the Union of
India
: Mr. J.P. Joshi, learned Additional
Advocate General with Mr. Pradeep
Joshi, learned Additional Chief
Standing Counsel for the State of
Uttarakhand
: Mr. B.D. Pande, learned counsel for
the intervener in WPPIL No. 211 of
2019 & WPPIL No. 216 of 2019
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Vipin Sanghi)
In the light of the fact that the notification
dated 21.11.2019, which is impugned in the present
petitions, has been superceded by the subsequent
notification dated 19.02.2020, these petitions have
become infructuous.
2) The same are, accordingly, dismissed as such.
3) All pending applications in these petitions also
stands disposed of.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
________________
RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Dt: 10th MAY, 2023 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!