Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Uttarakhand vs Unknown
2023 Latest Caselaw 1675 UK

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1675 UK
Judgement Date : 19 June, 2023

Uttarakhand High Court
Uttarakhand vs Unknown on 19 June, 2023
                Office Notes,
             reports, orders or
SL.           proceedings or
      Date                                    COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No             directions and
             Registrar's order
              with Signatures
                                  CRLA No. 537 of 2022
                                  Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. Mukul Singh Dangi, learned counsel for the appellant/applicant.

2. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. R.K. Joshi and Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned Brief Holders for the State of Uttarakhand/sole respondent.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

4. This is an appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C., against the judgment and order dated 13.09.2022 and 14.09.2022 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act)/ District and Session Judge, Tehri Garhwal in Session Trial No. 31 of 2021, "State of Uttarakhand Vs. Suraj Gurang". By the said judgment, the appellant/applicant was convicted for offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(3) of IPC and Section 5(1)/6 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

5. By the said judgment and order, he was sentenced to undergo 3 years rigorous imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC alongwith fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine,

he shall further undergo one month simple imprisonment additionally, sentenced to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 366 of IPC alongwith fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he shall further undergo two month simple imprisonment additionally, sentenced to undergo 20 year rigorous imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 376(3) of IPC alongwith fine of Rs. 25,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he shall further undergo six month simple imprisonment additionally and sentenced to undergo maximum punishment of rigorous imprisonment for 20 years for the offence punishable under Section 5(1)/6 of POCSO Act alongwith fine of Rs. 25,000/-, and in case of default in payment of fine, he shall further undergo six months additional simple imprisonment. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

6. The appellant/applicant has sought his release on bail.

7. Learned counsel for the appellant/ applicant argued on the Bail Application and submitted that the appellant/applicant is languishing in jail since 12.05.2021.

8. It is also submitted by the learned

counsel for the appellant/applicant that the victim has not supported her case, during the trial and in her statement, during examination in-chief; she has deposed nothing about the factum of commission of rape upon her. Apart from that, it has also been submitted that when victim was taken to the doctor for medical examination, she has told doctor her age about 17 years, while during the trial, the age was recorded as 14 years, at the time of commission of the alleged offence.

9. We have given a thoughtful consideration to the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant/applicant. From the evidence, it is demonstrated that the victim went with the appellant/applicant on her own volition, while going from her village to Rani Chauri, from where to Chamba and later on, Khatima, by train, where she was recovered, she did not raise any alarm.

10. We have also noticed that the age of the appellant/applicant, at the time of commission of offence, is also 21 years. The case appeared to have love angle too.

11. Keeping in view the aforesaid circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the appeal, we

are of the opinion that appellant/applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail at this stage. Accordingly, bail application (IA No. 3 of 2022) is allowed.

12. Let the appellant/applicant-Suraj Gurang be released on bail during the pendency of this appeal on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable local sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned.

13. IA       No.2       of         2022        (Exemption
Application),     IA        No.3     of    2022      (Bail
Application)      and         IA    No.4        of   2023

(Miscellaneous Application with Objection) would also stand disposed of.

14. List in due course.

(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 19.06.2023 PN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter