Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 515 UK
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
WRIT PETITION (M/S) NO. 399 OF 2023
24TH FEBRUARY, 2023
Between:
Mohd. Saleem ...... Petitioner
and
Nagar Palika Parishad, Ramnagar ...... Respondent
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned
counsel
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. B.D. Pande, learned counsel
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Vipin Sanghi)
Issue notice.
Counsel for the respondent appears and accepts
notice.
2) The relief sought in this petition reads as
follows:
2
"A writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus directing the respondent to decide
the representation dated 23.01.2023 (Annexure
No. 3 to the writ petition) moved by the
petitioner before the Executive Officer, Nagar
Palika Parishad, Ramnagar, District Nainital as
early as possible in accordance with law."
3) Though the relief sought in the petition appears
to be innocuous, in fact, the petitioner is seeking our seal
of approval on the prayer made in the representation,
which is to seek extension of the contractual period of 52
days, which, according to the petitioner, was the delayed
period, during which the petitioner was not able to work
the contract awarded to him by the respondent.
4) We cannot put our seal of approval on the relief
sought by the petitioner in his representation. The
representation made by the petitioner may be decided on
its merits by the respondent.
5) Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid
terms.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
_________________
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt: 24th FEBRUARY, 2023 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!