Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2036 UK
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
2nd AUGUST, 2023
DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION No.01 of 2023
with
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 517 of 2023
Between:
Smt. Krishna Devi .....Revisionist
and
State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent
Counsel for the Revisionist : Mr. Shariq Khurshid,
Advocate.
Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. B.P.S. Mer,
Brief Holder.
Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
Revisionist-accused Smt. Krishna Devi was
convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a period of two years along with a fine of
Rs. 500/- for the offence under Section 452 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860 (in short, "IPC"); she was convicted and
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period
of one year along with a fine of Rs.500/- for the offence
under Section 323 IPC; she was convicted and sentenced
to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year
along with a fine of Rs. 500/- for the offence under
Section 504 IPC, and, she was further convicted and
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period
of one year along with a fine of Rs.500/- for the offence
under Section 506 IPC. All the sentences were directed to
run concurrently.
2. Against the said judgment dated 09.02.2016,
passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, District
Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Case No. 174 of 2012, a
Criminal Appeal (No.35 of 2016) was filed. The sentence,
passed by learned Trial Court, has been modified by
learned Appellate Court by passing judgment on
08.08.2022. Revisionist has been sentenced to undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a period of six-six months along
with fine for each of the offences under Sections 452, 323,
504 and 506 IPC.
3. Present Revision has been filed along with an
Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to
condone the delay of 262 days' in preferring the Revision.
The said application has not been opposed by the State.
4. In the interest of justice, Delay Condonation
Application (IA No.01 of 2023) is allowed. The delay is
condoned.
5. Mr. Shariq Khurshid, Advocate, contended that
the judgment passed by both the Courts are against the
facts and circumstances of the case and there are material
contradictions in the statements of the prosecution's
witnesses.
6. Admit.
7. List on 02.12.2023.
8. Heard on the Bail Application (IA No. 2 of 2023).
9. It is submitted by Mr. Shariq Khurshid,
Advocate, that the revisionist, aged about 72 years, was
on bail during the trial and appeal, and, the conditions of
bail were neither misused nor violated by her.
10. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the revisionist
Smt. Krishna Devi.
11. Let the revisionist be released on bail on her
executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable
sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the
Trial Court.
___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt: 02.08.2023 Neha
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!