Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPSB/575/2022
2022 Latest Caselaw 3244 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3244 UK
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/575/2022 on 30 September, 2022
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
                 AT NAINITAL
           HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
                              AND
                 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.C. KHULBE

                       30TH SEPTEMBER, 2022
         WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 575 OF 2022

Between:

Abhilasha Rani.
                                                             ...Petitioner

and

Uttarakhand Public Service Commission.
                                                         ...Respondent

Counsel for the petitioner.    :   Mr. Niranjan     Bhatt,   the   learned
                                   counsel.

Counsel for the respondent.    :   Mr. Ashish Joshi, the learned counsel.

JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)


              The petitioner has preferred the present Writ

Petition to seek a direction to the respondent to permit

her to deposit online, or offline fee for the Mains

Examination, so that she is able to appear in the

Uttarakhand Combined State Civil/Upper Subordinate

Service Examination, 2021.


2.            The admitted position is that the petitioner

secured 80.9935 marks in the preliminary examination.

The first result of the said preliminary examination was

declared on 26.05.2022, wherein the petitioner was not

shown as qualified. The additional result was advertised
 by the respondent on 30.05.2022, wherein the petitioner

was shown as qualified in the preliminary examination.


3.            On 03.06.2022, a newspaper publication was

made     by     the   respondents      informing   all    successful

candidates to deposit the fee between 04.06.2022 to

18.06.2022.       The petitioner, however, did not make the

said deposit. The portal for making payment of fee was

again opened for all candidates on 10.08.2022, and once

again SMS messages were sent to the candidates,

including the petitioner, on two occasions. Inspite of the

same, the petitioner did not deposit the fee.


4.            On account of certain petitions being filed, and

orders   being        passed    therein   by    this     Court,    the

respondent-Commission was required to again publish

the   results.        Accordingly,    results   have     now      been

published on 22.09.2022.              In addition to the earlier

declared successful candidates, several other candidates

have now been shown as qualified to undertake the

mains examination.             Obviously, in respect of those

candidates, who have now been declared as qualified, the

payment portal for depositing fee is being opened.                The

petitioner has now approached this Court stating that

she, too, should be permitted to deposit her fee, along
                                  2
 with the candidates, who have now been declared as

qualified for the mains examination.


5.        We do not find any merit in this Writ Petition.

The petitioner has been given ample opportunity to

deposit the fee.     She could deposit the fee, firstly,

between 04.06.2022 to 18.06.2022. Not only newspaper

publication was made about the same, but she was also

intimated through SMS on her registered Mobile Number.

She was again granted an opportunity in August, 2022,

when a public notice was issued, and she was also sent

two SMS messages regarding the same.          However, she

did not make the deposit.        Her plea, that she was not

aware that she was qualified, cannot be accepted in this

background.


6.        To permit the petitioner to now deposit the fee

would open floodgates, as there would be any number of

other candidates, who may have not deposited the fee for

the mains examination.     It would also be discriminatory

to those, who may not have deposited the fee earlier, and

are, therefore, out of the race.




                             3
 7.         We, therefore, do not find any merit in the

present   Writ   Petition.   The   same    is,   accordingly,

dismissed.


8.         In sequel thereto, pending application, if any,

also stands disposed of.


                                    ________________
                                     VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.


                                          _____________
                                           R.C. KHULBE, J.

Dt: 30th September, 2022 Rahul

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter