Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

CTR/13/2013
2022 Latest Caselaw 3242 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3242 UK
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
CTR/13/2013 on 30 September, 2022
   IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
              AT NAINITAL
      HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
                         AND
            HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.C. KHULBE

              30TH SEPTEMBER, 2022

   COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 13 OF 2013

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Uttarakhand, Dehradun.               ...Respondents
 COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 14 OF 2013 (2)

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Uttarakhand, Dehradun.               ...Respondents
 COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 15 OF 2013 (3)

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Uttarakhand, Dehradun.               ...Respondents
 COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 16 OF 2013 (4)

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Uttarakhand, Dehradun.               ...Respondents
 COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 17 OF 2013 (5)

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
 Uttarakhand, Dehradun.        ...Respondents
 COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 18 OF 2013 (6)

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Uttarakhand, Dehradun.               ...Respondents
 COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 19 OF 2013 (7)

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Uttarakhand, Dehradun.               ...Respondents
 COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 15 OF 2015 (8)

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Uttarakhand, Dehradun.               ...Respondents
 COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 78 OF 2017 (9)

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Uttarakhand, Dehradun.               ...Respondents
COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION NO. 79 OF 2017 (10)

Between:
M/s Akums Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, through its
Director Mr. Sanjeev Jain            .....Revisionist
and
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Uttarakhand, Dehradun.               ...Respondents

Counsel for the revisionist   :   Mr. Arvind Kumar and Ms. Vandana
                                  Singh Mehra.

Counsel for the respondent    :   Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder
                                  for the State of Uttarakhand.



                                  2
 Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made
the following

COMMON JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)

          The issue raised in these Commercial Tax

Revisions was also the issue raised in Commercial Tax

Revision No. 80 of 2017 in respect of the same

revisionist / assessee. The substantive question of law

considered by this Court in CTR No. 80 of 2017 was the

following:-

     "Whether the order of the Sales Tax Tribunal,
     Uttarakhand in holding that the revisionist is not
     entitled to reduce the levy of Central Sales Tax @
     1% for the financial year 2010-11 onwards) after
     the Capital Investment of Plant and Machinery,
     having exceeded R. 25 Crores in it's Unit-1, as on
     18.03.2010, is erroneous in the facts of this case?"


2.        Commercial Tax Revision No. 80 of 2017 was

related to the Assessment Year 2011-12 (Central).      This

Court disposed of the same by its judgment dated

22.07.2022, finding that the Assessing Officer had

imposed tax @ 2% de hors the assessment made by the

Committee of the extent of capital investment made by

the Assessee in plant and machinery as per Notification

No. 6222 dated 25.07.2001, as modified by Notification

No. 822 dated 03.07.2004, issued by the Government of

Uttarakhand.       Consequently,     the   Division   Bench



                              3
 disposed of Commercial Tax Revision No. 80 of 2017 by

observing as follows:-


     "12. Thus, it is clear that in this case while
     imposing the Tax at the rate of 2% the Assessing
     Officer has not considered the assessment
     determined by any Committee, further he has
     relied on his own assessment. In that view of the
     matter, the order passed by the Assessing
     Authority, confirmed by the Appellate Authority and
     the Commercial Tax Appellate Tribunal is not
     sustainable. In that view of the matter, the Central
     Tax Revision is allowed. The orders passed by the
     learned     Commercial     Tax    Tribunal    dated
     16.06.2017, in Second Appeal No. 08 of 2017
     (2011-2012)....Central); order dated 27.11.2016
     passed by the Joint Commissioner (Appeal)-II,
     Commercial Tax, Haridwar; and the order dated
     27.03.2015, passed by the Assessing Authority are
     hereby set aside. The matter is remanded back to
     the Assessing Officer with a direction to the
     Commissioner of Commercial Tax Uttarakhand,
     Dehradun to move the Government for formation of
     the Committee as envisaged in the Notifications
     referred to above and refer the matter for
     determination of the exact and total capital
     investment by the revisionist for the period under
     consideration and, thereafter, issue a fresh
     assessment order in favour of the respondent."


3.        Undisputedly, the position is no different in the

assessment years, in relation to which the present

Commercial Tax Revisions have been preferred.        Since

the same lacuna inheres the Assessment Orders passed

by the Assessing Officer imposing tax @ 2% upon the

Assessee for the assessment years concerned in these

C.T.R.s, we dispose of these Revisions in terms of the


                            4
 judgment dated 22.07.2022 passed in Commercial Tax

Revision No. 80 of 2017.


4.         We, however, find that the said order, in its

last line, observes "thereafter, issue a fresh assessment

order in favour of the respondent." Obviously, the same

should read as "thereafter, issue a fresh assessment

order in accordance with law."

5.         Since the exercise has to be conducted by the

Committee in relation to several assessment years, we

direct that the same be concluded at the earliest, and

preferably within the next nine months.




                                  ________________
                                   VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.


                                      _____________
                                       R.C. KHULBE, J.

Dt: 30th September, 2022 Rathour

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter