Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPMS/2178/2022
2022 Latest Caselaw 3238 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3238 UK
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2178/2022 on 30 September, 2022
                Office Notes,
             reports, orders or
SL.           proceedings or
      Date                                    COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No             directions and
             Registrar's order
              with Signatures
                                  WPMS No. 2178 of 2022
                                  Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate for the petitioner.

Heard.

Petitioner filed a suit for cancellation of sale deed. With his suit, petitioner also filed an application for temporary injunction. Learned trial Court passed an order of temporary injunction on 23.09.2021, whereby defendants were restrained from creating third party interest and also from transferring possession of the suit property.

Respondent no. 2-the purchaser of suit property filed a Misc. Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) CPC and learned IIIrd Additional District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar vide judgment dated 23.08.2022, partly allowed the appeal and modified the order passed by learned trial Court by directing the parties to maintain status quo as regards title and possession of the suit property. The said judgment has been challenged by petitioner in this petition.

I have gone through the order passed by learned trial Court as well as the judgment rendered by learned Appellate Court. Learned Appellate Court has given valid reason for modifying the order and also for directing the parties to maintain status quo qua title and possession of the suit property.

Since transfer of property, which is subject matter of a pending suit, is subject to provision contained in Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, therefore, the interest of petitioner is protected.

Even otherwise also, temporary injunction is a discretionary relief and learned IIIrd Additional District Judge has exercised his discretion in a proper manner, thus, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the discretion exercised by learned Appellate Court.

Accordingly, writ petition fails and is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 30.09.2022 Navin

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter