Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPSB/379/2022
2022 Latest Caselaw 2864 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2864 UK
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/379/2022 on 8 September, 2022
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
                  AT NAINITAL

         THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
                                AND
            THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI


              WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 379 OF 2022

                        8th SEPTEMBER, 2022

Between:

Deepjyoti Kalita                          ......          Petitioner


and


Union of India and others                 ......         Respondents



Counsel for the petitioner    :   Mr.  Siddhartha     Sah,    learned
                                  counsel

Counsel for the respondents   :   Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, learned
                                  Assistant Solicitor General with Mr.
                                  Lalit Sharma, learned Standing
                                  Counsel for the Union of India /
                                  respondent Nos. 1 and 2




The Court made the following:

JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Vipin Sanghi)



Amendment Application (I.A. No. 03 of 2022)


             This application has been moved by the

petitioner to seek amendment of the writ petition. The

amendment has been sought with a view to raise a

challenge to the resolution passed by the Governing

Body of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
                                 2




Rishikesh, held on 26.03.2022.              Since by the said

resolution, the A.I.I.M.S., Rishikesh, inter alia, decided

that considering the interest of the Institute in terms of

academic and patient care services, no lien will be

granted to any employee and this should be the uniform

decision and standard rule in the Institute.


2)         The amendment application has been filed as

a consequence of the respondent-Institute filing a short

affidavit along with which, the minutes of the Governing

Body meeting held on 26.03.2022 has been placed on

record, which contains the aforesaid resolution under

Agenda No. GB : 5/21. The amendment is premised on

the plea that the petitioner has a right to maintain his

lien on the permanent post at A.I.I.M.S., Rishikesh,

while he accepts the employment offered to him by

A.I.I.M.S., Guwahati.         For this purpose the petitioner

places reliance on Fundamental Rule 13 which, insofar as

it is relevant, reads as follows :


           "F.R. 13. A Government servant who has acquired
     lien on a post retains the lien on that post, -

           (a)   while performing the duties of that post;

           (b)   while   on    foreign   service,   or   holding   a
                 temporary post, or officiating in another
                 post;
                             3




          (c)   during joining time on transfer to another
                post; unless he is transferred along with his
                title to a post on lower pay, in which case his
                lien is transferred to the new post from the
                date on which he is relieved of his duties in
                the earlier post; and

          (d)   while on leave; and

          (e)   while under suspension."




3)        We are not inclined to allow the amendment

application since we find that the legal plea sought to be

urged by the petitioner by way of amendment is not

tenable in law.   Fundamental Rule 13 proceeds on the

basis that where a Government servant "has acquired

lien on a post", in that eventuality, he shall retain his

lien on that post in the circumstances enumerated in

Clauses (a) to (e) of the Fundamental Rule 13. The said

Rule does not state that the employee who has got

employment in another organization is entitled, as a

matter of right, to retain his lien in the parent

organization. There is no corresponding obligation cast

on the parent organization to grant the lien to an

employee who wishes to take up employment with

another organization.    In our view, there is no vested

right to the petitioner to seek the lien on his post which

he is presently holding at A.I.I.M.S., Rishikesh.
                            4




4)        This application (IA No. 03 of 2022) is,

therefore, merit-less and is, hereby dismissed.


WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 379 of 2022



5)        In the light of the aforesaid discussion, we find

no merit in the petition.      The writ petition stands

dismissed accordingly.


          Interim Relief Application (IA No. 01 of 2022)

also stands disposed of.



                                      ________________
                                     VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.



                               ___________________
                               MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.

Dt: 8th SEPTEMBER, 2022 Negi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter