Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3299 UK
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 588 OF 2022
12th OCTOBER, 2022
Between:
Ramesh Chand ...... Petitioner
and
State of Uttarakhand
Through Secretary,
Public Works Department ...... Respondent
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Senior
Counsel assisted by Mr. Vinay
Bhatt, learned counsel
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy
Advocate General for the State /
respondent
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Vipin Sanghi)
The petitioner has preferred the present writ
petition to seek the following reliefs :
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus commanding the respondent to
consider and promote the petitioner from the
post of Assistant Engineer to the post of
2
Executive Engineer with effect from 2013 with
all consequential benefits.
ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
certiorari quashing the order dated
15.04.2021 issued by the respondent
(Contained as Annexure 1 to this writ petition)
and the respondent may also be directed to
reconsider the matter of the petitioner for
promotion to the post of Executive Engineer
from the post of Assistant Engineer.
iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
certiorari quashing the order dated
07.01.2020 issued by the respondent
(Contained as Annexure No. 2 to this petition)
by which the petitioner has been reverted
back to the post of Assistant Engineer.
iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus declaring the government order
dated 11.05.2005, bearing no.
1160(XXX)(2)/2005, (Contained as Annexure
no. 3 to this petition) as ultra vires to the
Constitution and the same may kindly be
quashed by a writ of certiorari.
v) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus, commanding the respondent to
provide the benefit of Assured Career
Progression (ACP) as per Scheme of ACP.
3
2) The petitioner is a public servant. The reliefs
sought by the petitioner can be considered and granted
by the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal. Since the
petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy, we are
not inclined to entertain this writ petition.
3) The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed
with liberty to the petitioner to approach the
Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.
Stay Application (IA No. 01 of 2022) also
stands disposed of.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
__________________
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.
Dt: 12th OCTOBER, 2022 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!