Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3296 UK
Judgement Date : 11 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1973 of 2022
Fly Express Logistics Pvt. Ltd. & Others
... Petitioners
Versus
Presiding Officer, DRT, Dehradun
And Others ... Respondents
Mr. M.C. Pant, Mr. Rakshit Joshi and Mr. Ram Kishan
Dubey, Counsel for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashish Joshi, Counsel for the respondent no. 2.
Mr. Mukesh Kaparwan, Standing Counsel for Union of
India/respondent no. 3.
Judgment reserved on: 23.8.2022
Judgment delivered on:11.10.2022
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Petitioners have challenged an interim order dated 22.7.2022 passed by Debt Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun in S.A. No. 67 of 2022, filed by them. By the impugned order, learned Tribunal granted protection to petitioners against coercive action by the bank, subject to deposit of rupees fifty lakhs by them within 30 days. The condition imposed by learned Tribunal in the impugned order is challenged in this writ petition.
This Court is not inclined to interfere with the interim order passed by learned Tribunal. Learned Counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioners are entitled to benefit of a scheme introduced by Government of India and this aspect has been completely overlooked by learned Tribunal while passing the impugned order.
The question raised by petitioners that they are entitled to benefit of a particular scheme is a question, which is to be decided by learned Tribunal in their Securitization Application. While granting protection to the applicant, learned Tribunal can impose some condition, which is deemed necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case. Thus, there is no scope for interference in the matter.
Accordingly, writ petition fails and is dismissed.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) Pr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!