Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1896 UK
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA
29TH JUNE, 2022
WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 330 OF 2022
Between:
Shashi Bhushan Shah.
...Petitioner
and
State of Uttarakhand and others.
...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, the learned
Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Neeti
Rana, the learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondent no. 1. : Mr. K.N. Joshi, the learned Deputy
Advocate General for the State of
Uttarakhand.
Counsel for the respondent nos. 2 : Mr. D.S. Patni, the learned Senior
and 3. Counsel assisted by Mr. B.S. Bisht, the
learned counsel.
JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
The petitioner is a public servant. Therefore,
he has an alternative and efficacious remedy of
approaching the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.
2. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed, with a
liberty to the petitioner to approach the Uttarakhand
Public Services Tribunal.
3. In sequel thereto, all pending applications also
stand disposed of.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
_____________
S.K. MISHRA, J.
Dt: 29th June, 2022 Rahul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!