Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Through: Ms. Meenu And Mr. R.C. ... vs State Of Uttarakhand
2022 Latest Caselaw 4076 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4076 UK
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
Through: Ms. Meenu And Mr. R.C. ... vs State Of Uttarakhand on 20 December, 2022
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
             AT NAINITAL
                     Writ Petition No. 3336 (MS) of 2022

Heera Lal.                                    ................Petitioner.

                                   Through: Ms. Meenu and Mr. R.C. Tamta,
                                   learned counsels for the petitioner.


                                  -Versus-
State of Uttarakhand
and others.                                           .........Respondents.
                                   Through: Shri Suyash Pant, learned Standing
                                   Counsel for State.


               Date of Hearing and judgment : 20.12.2022

Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.

1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking following relief:

"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing and commanding the respondents to grant one year age relaxation to the petitioner in upper age limit for contesting the election of student union of Government Under Graduate College, Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar.

ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner."

2. There is no dispute that because of the Covid-19 pandemic, no election could be held in the college for the last two academic sessions. Therefore, the petitioner, who is a student of Government Under Graduate College, Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar was denied of any chance of participating in the

election as a candidate. Participation in the elections of college union is an integral part of the education, in view of the fact that an opportunity is given to the students for developing their leadership qualities and because such a valuable right has been denied to the petitioner, hence, the writ petition is allowed.

3. The respondent no. 3 is directed to grant age relaxation to the petitioner for two years for the purpose of participating in the election. This may be taken as precedent and any other candidates, who have also been denied of any chance of participating in election, may also be granted age relaxation for two years.

4. Registry is directed to grant urgent certified copy of this order during the course of the day to learned counsel for the petitioner, as per Rules.

(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.) (Grant urgent certified copy of this judgment, as per Rules)

PN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter