Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

CLCON/181/2018
2021 Latest Caselaw 3528 UK

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3528 UK
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2021

Uttarakhand High Court
CLCON/181/2018 on 8 September, 2021
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
               AT NAINITAL
       ON THE 8th DAY OF September, 2021
                           BEFORE:
 HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
     Contempt Petition (M/S) No. 181 of 2018


BETWEEN:

Khemraj Bhatt                                      ...Petitioner

      (By Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Anil
       Anthwal, Advocate)

AND:

Sri Om Prakash                                   ...Respondent

      (Mr. J.S. Bisht, Standing Counsel for the State)


                        JUDGMENT
             WPSS    No.    259    of   2012    filed     by   the
petitioner    was    disposed      of   with    the      following
direction:-

"Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed with the direction the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of increment from 01.07.2010, family planning additional increment from 14.11.2008 and also to reimburse the amount of T.A. and Medical Bills amounting to Rs.44,798/- within a period of ten weeks from today, strictly in accordance with law."

2. Alleging non-compliance thereof, this contempt petition has been filed.

3. A response cum compliance affidavit has been filed by Mr. Om Prakash, Additional Chief

Secretary cum Director, Department of Civil Aviation, Uttarakhand. Para nos. 4 and 5 of the said affidavit are reproduced below:-

"4. That accordingly on receipt of the details of the matter pertaining to the petitioner, vide office order dated 08-02-2018 (which was issued on 15-02-2018 with diary No. 6029/17-

18) the answering respondent had considered the case of the petitioner for grant of increment as well as other matters, as directed by this Hon'ble Court. A copy of the office order dated 08-02-2018/15-02-2018 is being filed herewith and marked as Annexure No. CA-1. Here, it would be pertinent to state that vide G.O. No. 395 dated 17-10-2008, it is provided that as per the fitment table dated 01-01-2006 for higher grade i.e. Rs. 5500-9000, the same is made under payband-2, as Rs. 9300-34800, with grade pay of Rs. 4600/-. Further as per the G.O. dated 25-09-2013 the benefit of this G.O. was not applicable to those employees who were not upgraded from the grade of 5500-9000 to the upgraded scale of 7450-11000 and since those who were not upgraded accordingly were not entitled to get the benefit out of the said G.O.

5. That by way of the said order dated 08-02-2018/15-02-2018, with respect to the other grievance of the petitioner regarding voluntary family planning additional increment, it was clearly informed that vide G.O. No. 1683/16-11-80-9(155)79, dated 26-05-1980, the petitioner had to apply to his parent department since, such issues are to be settled and sanctioned by the appointing authority and on the basis of said calculation by his parent department, he would be given such benefits for the period he remained on deputation in the Department of Civil Aviation."

4. From the stand taken by respondent in his affidavit, it is apparent that petitioner's claim for increment with effect from 01.07.2010 has been rejected on the ground that petitioner is not eligible for grant of increment in terms of Government Order dated 25.09.2013. Order dated 15.02.2018 passed by

Director, Civil Aviation is on record as Annexure CA-

1. Regarding family planning additional increment, it has been stated in the order dated 15.02.202018 that the same shall be sanctioned by the Competent Authority in petitioner's parent department. Regarding T.A. and Medical Bills, it has been stated in the order dated 15.02.2018 that petitioner has not submitted such bills in the Directorate of Civil Aviation and the same shall be paid to the petitioner as & when he submits the requisite bills.

5. From the stand taken by the respondent in his affidavit, it is apparent that this is not a case of wilful disobedience and petitioner's claim has been considered as per Rules/Policy. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed.

6. Contempt notice issued to the respondent is hereby discharged.

7. However petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the competent authority, in his parent department for grant of family planning increment. Regarding the amount due as medical reimbursement and T.A., petitioner shall be at liberty to submit the bills to the Competent Authority. If petitioner submits the bills within four weeks, the Competent Authority shall examine petitioner's claim and pass appropriate order, in accordance with rules, within eight weeks thereafter.

8. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner from approaching the appropriate forum for

claiming increment with effect from 01.07.2010.

(MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.) Shubham

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter